Cookies Policy
Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Selective Control of Peep Vocalizations By Familiar Sound in Young Coturnix Quail

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Two experiments were designed to examine the hypothesis that young Coturnix quail can learn to peep selectively to familiar sounds soon after hatching. The possibility that the presence of a familiar visual "imprinting" stimulus during training is necessary for effective post hatch learning, as has been reported for several other species, was also considered. Experimental quail were exposed to brief repetitive sequences of 700 Hz or 900 Hz tones alternating with equal periods of silence for a total of 80 min. Chicks were exposed either alone or in groups, and cither with or without a familiar visual imprinting object. Controls were not exposed to either sound stimulus. For testing, peeps emitted when chicks were presented successively with the two tones and with periods of silence were recorded. Results of both experiments revealed a significant tendency for experimental birds to peep more to the familiar than to the novel test sound. This result demonstrates early post-hatch auditory discrimination learning in Coturnix quail, and is in basic agreement with results from several other studies of precocial birds. It is suggested that if a similar enhancement of peeping to a familiar parent's voice occurs under natural rearing conditions, it could function adaptively to facilitate brood cohesion. Unlike previous results from several other species, simple post-hatch exposure to a sound in the absence of a familiar visual imprinting stimulus was sufficient to cause a selective enhancement of peeps to the familiar sound. The presence of a familiar visual object during training had little effect. Since auditory discriminations developed soon after hatching and as a result of simple exposure to a sound in the apparent absence of an external reinforcer, "auditory imprinting" could have been involved. This interpretation was rejected, however, because peeps were selectively enhanced, not reduced as is typical in imprinting studies. An hypothesis of simple habituation of peeps also fails, for the same reason. An explanation in terms of disinhibition of peeps, resulting from habituation of some mutually exclusive alternate response, remains possible.


Article metrics loading...


Affiliations: 1: Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada


Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation