Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Aggressive Communication By Lar Us Gla Ucescens Part IV : Experiments On Visual Communication

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

The results of dummy-experiments with Glaucus-winged Gulls on the selection of aggressive display postures for attack, the importance of head and neck level versus the angle of the head with the neck in the discrimination between postures, and the effect of head and neck movement on the response to automated models, were included in this study. It was found that when a pair of models was placed in a territory, the model mounted in a posture with a higher head-neck level, would consistently be attacked first. These results confirmed the importance of head-neck level as a visual cue used in discriminating between the postural components of aggressive displays. It was further demonstrated that the angle of the head with the neck (bill angle) was a relatively unimportant visual cue used in descrimination between postures. Experiments with models capable of making head-neck movements controlled by the experimenter demonstrated that responding gulls reacted to the model from a greater distance, moved away more frequently, and attacked less frequently when the model head-neck was in a low (horizontal) position. These results suggested that the observed greater frequency of attack on static models having a higher head-neck position was due to an inhibition of attack by models with a low head-neck positions. Thus, it was hypothesized that the displays using these low head-neck positions conveyed greater "threat" (as defined by STOUT, 1975), and would be more effective in preventing attack and/or hastening the escape of the bird toward which they were directed.

Affiliations: 1: Biology Dept., Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan, U.S.A.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation