Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Snake Species Discrimination and the Role of Olfactory Cues in the Snake-Directed Behavior of the California Ground Squirrel

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

This experiment had two objectives. One was to seek evidence for greater caution by California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beccheyi) when interacting with venomous rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis), their most important snake predator, than when interacting with nonvenomous gopher snakes (Pituophis nielanoleucus), their second-most important snake predator. The second was to examine the role of olfaction in mediating snake-directed behavior by these squirrels, since many squirrel-snake encounters occur in burrows where visual cues are unavailable. In an illuminated room, we videotaped the responses by eight freely moving ground squirrels to the two snake species; the snakes were presented in large, transparent plastic bags that were either sealed (odor unavailable) or perforated (odor available). The results confirmed our predictions that the squirrels should behave more cautiously toward rattlesnakes than toward gopher snakes, and that olfaction is an important mediator of snake-directed behavior. Although the squirrels approached the two snake species equally often, they attended more to the rattlesnake than to the gopher snake, but remained farther away from the rattlesnake. When snake odor was available, the squirrels spent more time attending to the snakes, approached the snakes more frequently, approached the snakes in elongate postures more often and sand kicked more at the snakes. We proposed the following. i. The antipredator strategy of snake harassment by California ground squirrels is sensitive to risk, exhibiting attenuation where risk is higher. 2. Olfaction is likely to be even more important during squirrel-snake encounters in the dark, especially in burrows. 3. The ability to recognize snakes on the basis of odor may not depend on prior experience with snakes, and may circumvent difficulties associated with visual detection of snakes.

Affiliations: 1: (Graduate Group in Ecology and Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California, U.S.A.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation