Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Comparative Statistical and Information Analysis of Combat in the Fiddler Crabs, Uca Pugilator and U. Pugnax

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Statistical and information theory analyses were performed with data derived from the aggressive interactions of two temperate species of fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator and U. pugnax). Over 400 fights were observed for each species, in their natural habitats. The two species showed differences in the distributions of their aggressive acts and in the average number of acts performed during combat. Many acts were statistically linked in ways which align meaningfully with the contribution of aggressiveness to the survival of the animals. Information analysis showed quantitative differences in uncertainty measures, but the "efficiency" of their communication systems, i.e., the amount of information transmitted, remained the same between combatants of each species. An interesting finding is the relative difference (about 15%) in intraspecific normalized transmission values which occur between Resident and Wanderer. We suggest that this role-specific relationship can be addressed by hypothesizing the optimum strategies that would tend to maximize the combatant's burrow-holding potential, while minimizing the penalties for losing a burrow.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, Ill; 2: Department of Ecology, Ethology and Evolution, and the Neural and Behavioral Biology Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill., U.S.A


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation