Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Shell Dropping: Decision-Making and Optimal Foraging in Northwestern Crows

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Decision-making and optimal foraging was investigated in Northwestern crows (Corvus caurinus) feeding on whelks (Thais lamellosa). Crows foraged on whelks by dropping them from a height for breaking. This foraging pattern is a stochastic process; the probability of breaking depends on height of drop, size of whelk and type of substrate. Large whelks selected by crows broke more readily than medium and small ones. They also had a higher caloric content. Crows minimized total amount of ascending flight required for breaking whelks when choosing height of drop. This was advantageous because ascending flight was energetically expensive. Crows dropped individual whelks repeatedly until they broke. This was profitable because percentage of whelks breaking over successive drops remained relatively stable. Thus, it was not beneficial to go in search of another whelk if a given one did not immediately break. All whelks were dropped on rock, the best substrate available for breaking. Crows made a net gain of 1.49 kcal per whelk dropped, sufficient to break an additional 1.5 whelks. Dropping medium and small whelks would have resulted in a loss of energy because these whelks broke less readily and also had a lower caloric content than large ones. Achieved foraging efficiency was 3.71. This is close to the maximum value attainable for crows. Foraging efficiency was relatively insensitive to length of foraging bout and crows took from one to three whelks per bout.

Affiliations: 1: (Department of Zoology, U.B.C., Vancouver, B. C., Canada

10.1163/156853979X00269
/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00269
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00269
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00269
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00269
1979-01-01
2016-12-05

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation