Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Function of Complexity in the Courtship of the Grasshopper Myrmeleotettix Maculatus

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Males of the grasshopper Myrmeleotettix maculatus have a courtship which is more complex than that of many other grasshopper species in terms of the number of body parts and different movements involved. The courtship consists of four distinct phases which are described in detail. The female may respond by either ignoring the male, by rejecting him or by calling back. Only females which call back are mated. In laboratory cages where male and female grasshoppers were brought into contact for the first time, 1610 courtship initiations were observed. Only 32% of these proceeded beyond the first phase, and 10% actually reached the last phase of the courtship sequence. Males were often persistent courters with a trend for succeeding courtships to one female to reach the same or a later phase. Females may respond, by calling, at any phase of the male courtship. A male may attempt to mate with a female at any phase of his courtship, but his success is higher if the female has called first. A male will almost always attempt to mate with a female once he has reached the final courtship phase, but he rarely succeeds. These observations are used to examine hypotheses to account for the significance of complexity in the courtship of this species. It is unlikely to serve as a species specific signal, an indicator of male fitness, an advertisement for mates over distance, or a mechanism to prepare males for copulation. Complexity might serve to convert females from a semi-receptive to a fully receptive state. If females could be prepared in this way, it would allow them to continue eating when not being courted. This would be advantageous because it would allow the maximum accumulation of reproductive material in the female. The behaviour might have arisen through sexual selection and have been then given this alternative function.

Affiliations: 1: University of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K.

10.1163/156853979X00476
/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00476
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00476
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00476
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853979x00476
1979-01-01
2016-12-11

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation