Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Chaffinch Song Types: Their Frequencies in the Population and Distribution Between Repertoires of Different Individuals

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

In a population of chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs) some song types are produced by many individuals while others occur only in the repertoire of single individuals. This frequency distribution of song types fits that predicted from a model for the frequency of neutral alleles, suggesting that song types are copied at random rather than some being favoured over others. Both comparison with this model and computer simulations suggest that the "mutation rate" in song copying is around 15%, changes in this case arising either through immigration or because of inaccuracies in copying. Such a rate of change would also lead the songs present to change with time to much the same extent as we have found. No evidence could be found that particular combinations of song types tended to occur more often than expected in the same repertoire, suggesting that repertoires are built up by copying from more than one individual. Rare songs (those unique to a particular individual in the population) do, however, tend to cluster in the same repertoire, probably because some of the birds possessing them are immigrants. Repertoire size clusters at around 2-3 song types but is not significantly different from that predicted if birds can learn the same song type more than once so that their observed repertoire size is smaller than that which they actually possess.

Affiliations: 1: Ethology & Neurophysiology Group, School of Biology, University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation