Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Causation and Function of Different Vocal Reactions of Little Gulls Larus Minutus To Intruders Near the Nest

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

[This study deals with (1) which vocalizations are made by little gulls (Larus mireutus) during agonistic interactions and (2) how these are related with overt attack and escape behaviour. Under natural circumstances, when little gulls react to intruders approaching the nests, five different call types can be heard. Four of these, Tuk, Keè, Eeyit and Whèt, often occurred during experiments using stuffed intruder models (little gull and black-headed gull). Reactions of incubating little gulls to a stuffed conspecific placed near the nests, showed that the occurrence of different call types is related to different phases of the flight pattern, such as circling above the intruder, approaching, attacking and moving away. Reactions to a stuffed little gull and black-headed gull which were moved towards and away from the nests revealed that the call types Whèt, Eeyit, Keè and Tuk, were, in decreasing order, associated with actual attack. Consistent individual differences existed in the reactions to the experimental intruders. The movements and the vocalizations made by the gulls when reacting to the experimental intruders are explained as a consequence of a conflict between motivational systems for attack and escape. It is argued that different call types are related with different strengths of activation of these systems. Differences between individuals in the reactions to the intruders can largely be explained by individual-typical differences in motivation. A comparison of the physical structure of each type of vocalization in relation to its underlying motivational state, shows a positive relationship between call duration and attack motivation. Tuk is believed to function as a warning for neighbouring birds, chicks and the mate. Eeyit seems to convey 'I shall attack, if provoked' and is intended for the intruder. Whèt probably acts as a vocal part of the actual attack and may help in impressing and distracting the intruder. The functional significance of Keè is as yet unknown., This study deals with (1) which vocalizations are made by little gulls (Larus mireutus) during agonistic interactions and (2) how these are related with overt attack and escape behaviour. Under natural circumstances, when little gulls react to intruders approaching the nests, five different call types can be heard. Four of these, Tuk, Keè, Eeyit and Whèt, often occurred during experiments using stuffed intruder models (little gull and black-headed gull). Reactions of incubating little gulls to a stuffed conspecific placed near the nests, showed that the occurrence of different call types is related to different phases of the flight pattern, such as circling above the intruder, approaching, attacking and moving away. Reactions to a stuffed little gull and black-headed gull which were moved towards and away from the nests revealed that the call types Whèt, Eeyit, Keè and Tuk, were, in decreasing order, associated with actual attack. Consistent individual differences existed in the reactions to the experimental intruders. The movements and the vocalizations made by the gulls when reacting to the experimental intruders are explained as a consequence of a conflict between motivational systems for attack and escape. It is argued that different call types are related with different strengths of activation of these systems. Differences between individuals in the reactions to the intruders can largely be explained by individual-typical differences in motivation. A comparison of the physical structure of each type of vocalization in relation to its underlying motivational state, shows a positive relationship between call duration and attack motivation. Tuk is believed to function as a warning for neighbouring birds, chicks and the mate. Eeyit seems to convey 'I shall attack, if provoked' and is intended for the intruder. Whèt probably acts as a vocal part of the actual attack and may help in impressing and distracting the intruder. The functional significance of Keè is as yet unknown.]

Affiliations: 1: (Zoological Laboratory, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren (Gr.), The Netherlands

10.1163/156853986X00504
/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00504
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00504
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00504
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00504
1986-01-01
2016-12-05

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation