Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Demography and the Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in the Bicolored Wren, Campylorhynchus Griseus

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

1. Two adjacent populations of the bicolored wren differ significantly in social structure. In one population 83% of groups consist of unaided pairs. The rest contain, in addition, a single male nonreproductive helper. About 43% of the groups in the other population consist of unaided pairs. The rest contain from one to three helpers, and helpers may be of either sex. 2. Helpers are always individuals who have failed to disperse from their natal territory. In both populations they augment group reproductive success and reduce mortality among the breeding pair, although a single helper produces a reproductive enhancement as great as that of multiple helpers. 3. Group-size-specific reproduction and adult mortality do not differ between the populations, but juvenile mortality and average territory size differ significantly. 4. The population consequences of these differences suggest that group size is held below its optimum in one habitat by high juvenile mortality, whereas habitat saturation is probably responsible for the fact that about one-third of all groups in the second habitat contain more than an optimum number of members. 5. These demographic parameters suggest that habitat saturation is not a necessary condition for the maintenance of helping behavior in either population.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.

10.1163/156853986X00667
/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00667
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00667
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00667
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853986x00667
1986-01-01
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation