Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Significance of Antiphonal Vocalisation By the Spring Peeper, Pseudacris Crucifer (Amphibia, Anura)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

1. Male spring peepers respond to acoustic interference from an encroaching conspecific with a graded behavioral sequence: they increase their call repetition rate, they emit one or more encounter calls, they entrain their calls to those of the intruder. 2. Once entrained, males continue to call synchronously for extended periods. 3. The time interval between the end of the leader's call and the beginning of the follower's call (the intraduet interval) is consistent, and is maintained despite changes in the duration or repetition rate of the leader's call. 4. Our data corroborate earlier investigators who concluded that the follower is stimulated by the onset of the leader's call, but is inhibited from calling until a fixed time interval after the leader has ceased calling. 5. Controlled discrimination tests reveal no differential mating success by the leader or the follower within a simulated duet. 6. Females exhibited a significant preference for a duet over a soloing male. 7. Although test females were able distinguish between the simultaneous broadcast of two phase-locked call sequences differing only in frequency, they did so in the absence of alternative, uncovered calls. 8. We conclude that antiphonal vocalisation functions primarily to reduce the potential for broadcast interference during the initial phase of female phonotaxis.

Affiliations: 1: Biological Sciences/Institute of Animal Behavior, Towson State University, Towson, Maryland U.S.A. 21204

10.1163/156853987X00233
/content/journals/10.1163/156853987x00233
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853987x00233
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853987x00233
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853987x00233
1987-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation