Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Escape Gaits of White-Tailed Deer, Mule Deer and Their Hybrids: Gaits Observed and Patterns of Limb Coordination

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

1. The escape gaits of white-tailed deer, mule deer and hybrid white-tailed x mule deer from Alberta were examined to investigate two hypotheses: 1) that the distinctive security patterns of white-tailed deer and mule deer underly their traditional habitat segregation, and 2) that interbreeding between white-tailed deer and mule deer results in disrupted security patterns for hybrid progeny. The first step is investigating these hypotheses, and the goals of this paper, were to identify gaits used by each type of deer and to compare characteristics of limb coordination in these strides. 2. High speed cinematography was used to record the fast escape gaits to captive white-tails, mule deer and hybrids. HILDEBRAND'S (1977) method for analyzing asymmetrical gaits were adapted to examine characteristics of limb coordination. 3. All groups galloped at times, but only white-tails galloped for escape when most alarmed. Mule deer stotted and F1 hybrids (with white-tail and with mule deer mothers) bounded when seemingly most alarmed. Gaits of F1 hybrids were similar among individuals. Although gaits of 3/4- and 7/8-mule deer were variable, these backcrosses largelyfailed to reproduce the specialized mule deer gaits. The consistency of white-tail, mule deer and FI hybrid gaits indicates that these patterns have a strong genetic basis and could have evolved in response to different selective pressures. 4. Galloping white-tails tend to have two brief suspensions in their strides, whereas galloping mule deer tend to have prolonged suspension after the hind limb departure and more overlap between the hind and fore limbs. In part due to these characteristics, galloping white-tails attain faster speeds than galloping mule deer or hybrids. Hybrids are intermediate, but much more similar to mule deer. 5. Limb timing data were plotted on three-dimensions with the axes fore lead, hind lead and midtime lag to consider the range of strides employed by deer. Strides of the purebred gallops and mule deer stott fell into discrete regions of this figure, indicating these gaits are qualitatively distinct for contemporary white-tails and mule deer. liule deer strides that were intermediate between the gallop and stott had large overlap between the fore and hind limbs (i.e. small midtime lag) relative to the amount of overlap between the right and left fore limb (i.e. fore lead), perhaps reflecting gait forms that were evolutionary transitions to the stott.

Affiliations: 1: (Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation