Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Sequential Assessment and Decision-Making in Humans

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

In two experiments inspired by theories of sequential information-gathering tasks such as sequential mate assessment, human subjects were asked to view sequences of pictures of mythical birds, each of which varied in value according to one of three stimuli, namely tail length, band width or intensity of black and carried an associated score. The subjects chose one picture from the sequence so as to maximise their points scored. Only one picture could be seen at a time, if a picture was rejected it could not be revisited and there was a small constant devaluation of each successive picture. In the first experiment two random sequences of each of the three stimuli were viewed and subjects were given no prior information on the population of pictures, nor was the devaluation specified. In the second experiment, which used only pictures which varied in tail length, subjects cach saw a different random sequence and then the same fixed sequence. In addition, they were told there was either a 5%, 10% or 20% devaluation of succesive birds, and half the subjects were given prior information on the population to be viewed. Thus in this experiment scores could be corrected for position in the sequence. To summarise the major results: 1. Choice was made at an early stage in the sequence, usually the 3rd, 4th or 5th picture, and this was consistent in both experiments. 2. In Experiment 2, subjects given prior information or smaller devaluation functions chose later in the sequence. 3. In Experiment 2 there were no differences in the corrected scores achieved by subjects in our treatments of prior information or devaluation, but subjects achieved higher absolute scores as the devaluation decreased. 4. In both experiments the value of the chosen picture was positively correlated with the mean value of the prior sequence seen when absolute scores are used, but in Experiment 2 this effect disappears when corrected scores are used. 5. A large positive jump was a cue to stop in both the random and fixed sequences. Identification of relevant variables and patterns of decision making may further enlarge our understanding of sequential assessment in humans and other animal species.

Affiliations: 1: (Behavioural and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, The Man-chester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, U.K.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation