Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Memory for Locations of Stored Food in Willow Tits and Marsh Tits

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Some food-storing animals use spatial memory in food retrieval. There is variation amongst food-storing species in the duration over which food is stored and it is positively correlated with differences in the size of the part of the brain that is involved with memory for storage locations, the hippocampus. For example, British marsh tits (Parus palustris) are generally thought to retrieve their stores after a few hours or days whereas Scandinavian willow tits (P. montanus) have been shown to store their food for several weeks to months. Marsh tits also have a smaller hippocampus than do willow tits. This experiment tested the hypothesis that retrieval success (and thus memory capacity) of the two species differs depending on the usual length of time for which food is stored. Individuals of both species were tested on their ability to retrieve five stored food items after two differing delays: 2-3 h ('short') and 17 days ('long'). The prediction was that there would be no differences in retrieval performance between the species after the short delay but that willow tits would be more accurate at retrieving their stores than marsh tits after the long delay. The results did not provide support for this hypothesis as there were no differences between the species in retrieval performance following either delay: both species successfully retrieved food after both delays.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7 RU, UK; 2: Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 35, FIN-40351 Jyväsklyä, Finland

10.1163/156853996X00035
/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00035
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00035
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00035
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00035
1996-01-01
2016-08-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation