Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Ranging of Conspecific Songs By Kentucky Warblers and Its Implications for Interactions of Territorial Males

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Kentucky warblers (Oporornis formosus) each sing a single song pattern. To determine whether males could range (estimate the distance to) conspecific songs, we presented clean and reverberated versions of strangers' songs to 12 males in a factorial design. To assess differences between the playbacks and the subjects' own songs or neighbors' songs, we measured differences in minimal repetition periods between repeated acoustic elements in songs, features that could contribute to assessment of reverberation. Results indicated that Kentucky warblers can range conspecific songs and that similarity between playback songs and established neighbors' songs or a subject's own songs did not enhance this ability. Direct evidence that males misjudged the distance to reverberated playbacks excluded other interpretations of the results based on differences in the detectability or habituation of clean and reverberated songs. These results suggest further that assessment of reverberation is sufficient for ranging and that perceptual analysis of song is not necessarily linked to overt production. As a consequence, repertoires of songs do not necessarily promote interference between territorial neighbors.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA

10.1163/156853996X00044
/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00044
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00044
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00044
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00044
1996-01-01
2016-12-07

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation