Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Genetic Influences On Coping Behaviour in House Mouse Lines Selected for Aggression: Effects of the y cHromosome

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Male wild house mice selected for Short Attack Latency (SAL) show an active coping style to environmental challenges, whereas males selected for Long Attack Latency (LAL) generally exhibit a passive coping style. Previous studies showed that the aggressive SAL males develop routines more quickly and show more resistance to environmental changes than the less aggressive LAL ones; the latter behave more flexibly in non-social situations. Furthermore, using reciprocal F1s and backcross lines for SAL and LAL males, a Y chromosomal effect on aggression has been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to examine possible effects of the Y chromosome on behavioural flexibility. For this purpose six genotypes (SAL, LAL, their reciprocal F1s and their congenics for the non-pseudoautosomal part of the Y chromosome) were tested for their behavioural flexibility in a Y-maze. Differences between SAL and LAL were reproduced. Congenic lines showed identical scores to their parental ones. Regarding the reciprocal F1s, differences in aggression were not associated with behavioural flexibility. Therefore, it may be concluded that the Y chromosome does not influence aggression-related behavioural flexibility.

Affiliations: 1: Génétique, Neurogénétique et Comportement, URA 1294 CNRS, Université Paris V, UFR Biomédicale, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France; 2: University of Groningen, Department of Animal Physiology, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands

10.1163/156853996X00062
/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00062
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00062
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00062
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853996x00062
1996-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation