Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Light Flash Stimulation Alters the Nightingale's Singing Style: Implications for Song Control Mechanisms

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

To investigate decision processes during song performances in a species with a large repertoire and a versatile singing style we studied the characteristics of brief song interruptions in male nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos. Interruptions were induced experimentally by exposure to single light flashes. (1) The temporal positioning of stimuli within songs had no clear effect on the likelihood of a song interruption. (2) The delay between stimulus presentation and song interruption showed considerable variation. (3) Song types exposed to the stimulus were repeated significantly more often than in normal singing bouts. (4) In day time singing, durations of silent intersong intervals were not affected by stimulus presentations. During nocturnal singing however silent intersong intervals increased in duration after stimulus presentations unless a song type repetition was following subsequently. The results suggest a mechanism facilitating song type repetitions for songs that were disturbed during singing performance. Whether or not temporal control is affected seems to depend on both time of day and on whether or not a song is repeated after a stimulus presentation.

Affiliations: 1: (Institut fur Verhaltensbiologie, Freie Universitat Berlin, Haderslebener Str. 9, 12163 Berlin, Germany

10.1163/156853997X00070
/content/journals/10.1163/156853997x00070
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853997x00070
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853997x00070
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853997x00070
1997-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation