Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Artificial Visual Obstruction, Antipredator Vigilance, and Predator Detection in the Thirteen-Lined Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus Tridecemlineatus)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Antipredator vigilance behaviour is affected by a number of variables, but studies reporting experimental manipulation of visual obstructions are generally lacking in the literature. We examined the individual antipredator behaviour of free-ranging thirteen-lined ground squirrels in 7 city parks in Lincoln, Nebraska, USA as they fed on peanut butter within small plexiglass boxes. Boxes differed in the position and amount of visual occlusion for a squirrel feeding in it: opaque, clear, opaque-sides, and opaque-top (also opaque on the end). We experimentally controlled environmental and contextual variables that have been identified as affecting vigilance behaviour. We filmed 38 ground squirrels as they fed in the boxes, and the results indicate that ground squirrels treat lateral occlusion as functionally identical to complete occlusion. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the squirrels' behaviours in the clear versus the opaque-top box. In 35 approach tests, a person walked toward individual ground squirrels as they foraged in one of the 4 box types. The distance at which the squirrels reacted did not differ among the 4 box types. The results of these two experiments suggest that thirteen-lined ground squirrels compensate for visual occlusion, primarily through increased withdrawals coupled with low-level vigilance postures and that the position of visual occlusion can be of greater importance than the absolute amount of occlusion.

Affiliations: 1: Nebraska Behavioral Biology Group, School of Biological Sciences; 2: Nebraska Behavioral Biology Group, School of Biological Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation