Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The response of male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to same- and mixed-sex over-marks depends on the reproductive state of the top- and bottom-female scent donors

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Many female terrestrial mammals undergo postpartum estrus (PPE), a state of heightened sexual attractiveness to male conspecifics relative to females not in PPE (REF females). PPE and REF females of several species may use over-marks to maintain territories and attract and indicate interest in males as potential mates. In our first two experiments, we determined if the response of male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to the top- and bottom-scent donors of a same-sex over-mark was affected by the reproductive state of the scent donors. We found that after exposure to a same-sex over-mark in which the female scent donors were in the same reproductive state, males spent more time investigating the mark of the top-scent female. Males, however, spent more time investigating the mark of the PPE female to that of a female not in PPE, independent of the position of either female’s scent mark in the over-mark. The third and fourth experiments determined if the response of males to the female scent donor of a mixed-sex over-mark was affected by whether she is the top- or bottom-scent donor. In three of the four comparisons, males spent more time investigating the mark of a novel PPE female (not in the over-mark) to that of the top- or bottom-scent female. In addition, males spent similar amounts of time investigating the mark of a novel female not in PPE and that of a top-scent PPE female. However, males spent more time investigating the novel REF female’s mark compared to that of a bottom-scent PPE female. The results are discussed in terms of the natural history and mating strategies of male meadow voles.

Affiliations: 1: The University of Memphis, Department of Biological Sciences, 3700 Walker Avenue, Memphis, TN 38152, USA

10.1163/1568539X-00002999
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00002999
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00002999
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Berteaux D. , Bety J. , Rengifo E. , Bergeron J.M. ( 1999). "Multiple paternity in meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus): investigating the role of the female". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 45: 283- 291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050563
2. Birkhead T. ( 2000). Promiscuity: an evolutionary history of sperm competition. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
3. Boonstra R. , Xia X.H. , Pavone L. ( 1993). "Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 4: 83- 89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/4.1.83
4. Brown R.E. , Macdonald D.W. ( 1985a). Social odours in mammals, Vol Vol. 1. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Brown R.E. , Macdonald D.W. ( 1985b). Social odours in mammals, Vol Vol. 2. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Carter C.S. , Lederhendler I.I. , Kirkpatrick B. ( 1997). "The integrative neurobiology of affiliation". — In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol Vol. 807. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, NY.
7. delBarco-Trillo J. , Ferkin M.H. ( 2006). "Male meadow voles respond differently to risk and intensity of sperm competition". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 17: 581- 585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark001
8. delBarco-Trillo J. , Ferkin M.H. ( 2007). "Risk of sperm competition does not influence copulatory behavior in the promiscuous meadow vole ( Microtus pennsylvanicus)". — J. Ethol. Vol 25: 139- 145.
9. Dewsbury D.A. ( 1990). "Modes of estrus induction as a factor in studies of the reproductive behavior of rodents". — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. Vol 14: 147- 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(05)80215-5
10. Dewsbury D.A. , Evans R.L. , Webster D.G. ( 1979). "Pregnancy initiation in postpartum estrus in three species of muroid rodents". — Horm. Behav. Vol 13: 1- 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(79)90030-8
11. Ferkin M.H. ( 2006). "The amount of time that a meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, self-grooms is affected by its reproductive state and that of the odor donor". — Behav. Proc. Vol 73: 266- 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.06.005
12. Ferkin M.H. , Johnston R.E. ( 1995). "Effects of pregnancy, lactation, and postpartum oestrous on odour signals and the attraction in females meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 49: 1211- 1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1995.0153
13. Ferkin M.H. , Pierce A.A. ( 2007). "Perspectives on over-marking: is it good to be on top?"— J. Ethol. Vol 25: 139- 145.
14. Ferkin M.H. , Dunsavage J. , Johnston R.E. ( 1999). "What kind of information do meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus) use to distinguish between the top and bottom scent of an over-mark?"— J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 113: 43- 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.43
15. Ferkin M.H. , Lee D.N. , Leonard S.T. ( 2004). "The reproductive state of female voles affects their scent marking behavior and the response of male conspecifics to such marks". — Ethology Vol 110: 257- 272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00961.x
16. Ferkin M.H. , Combs A. , delBarco-Trillo J. , Pierce A.A. , Franklin S. ( 2008). "Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, have the capacity to recall the “what”, “where”, and “when” of a single past event". — Anim. Cogn. Vol 11: 147- 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0101-8
17. Ferkin M.H. , Briley D. , Ferkin B.D. , Hardaway A. , Applebury T. ( 2011). "Responses of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to areas containing over-marks and single scent marks of two opposite-sex conspecifics". — Behaviour Vol 148: 117- 130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/000579510X550544
18. Fisher H.S. , Swaisgood R.R. , Fitch-Snyder H. ( 2003). "Countermarking by male pygmy lorises ( Nycticebus pygmaeus): do females use odor cues to select mates with high competitive ability?"— Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 53: 123- 130.
19. Gilbert A.N. ( 1984). "Postpartum and lactational estrus: a comparative analysis in rodentia". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 98: 232- 245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.98.3.232
20. Hobbs N.J. , Ferkin M.H. ( 2011). "Dietary protein content affects the response of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, to over-marks". — Acta Ethol. Vol 14: 57- 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-011-0090-0
21. Hurst J.L. ( 1990a). "Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticusRutty. II. Communication between females". — Anim. Behav. Vol 40: 223- 232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80917-0
22. Hurst J.L. ( 1990b). "Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticusRutty. III. Communication between the sexes". — Anim. Behav. Vol 40: 233- 243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80918-2
23. Hurst J.L. , Beynon R.J. ( 2004). "Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signaling in mice". — Bioassays Vol 26: 1288- 1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20147
24. Johnston R.E. ( 1979). "Olfactory preferences, scent marking, and “proceptivity” in female hamsters". — Horm. Behav. Vol 13: 21- 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(79)90032-1
25. Johnston R.E. ( 1983). "Chemical signals and reproductive behavior". — In: Pheromones and reproduction in mammals( Vandenbergh J.G. , ed.). Academic Press, New York, NY, p.  27- 31.
26. Johnston R.E. ( 2003). "Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition". — J. Mammal. Vol 84: 1141- 1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/BLe-010
27. Johnston R.E. , Chiang G. , Tung C. ( 1994). "The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters". — Anim. Behav. Vol 48: 323- 330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1245
28. Johnston R.E. , Munver R. , Tung C. ( 1995). "Scent counter marks: selective memory for the top scent by golden hamsters". — Anim. Behav. Vol 49: 1435- 1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)90064-0
29. Jones E.N. ( 1990). "The effect of forage availability on the home range and population density of Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — J. Mammal. Vol 71: 382- 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1381950
30. Keller B.L. ( 1985). "Reproductive patterns". — In: Biology of new world Microtus ( Tamarin R.H. , ed.). The American Society of Mammalogists, Lawrence, KS, p.  725- 778.
31. Knobil E. , Neill D. ( 2006). Knobil and Neill’s physiology of reproduction, Vol Vol. 2, 3rd edn.Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford.
32. Lai S.-C. , Vasilieva N.Y. , Johnston R.E. ( 1996). "Odors providing sexual information in Djungarian hamsters: evidence for an across-odor code". — Horm. Behav. Vol 30: 26- 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.1996.0005
33. Lazaro-Perea C. , Snowdon C.T. , de Fátima Arruda M. ( 1999). "Scent-marking behavior in wild groups of common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus)". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 46: 313- 324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050625
34. Leonard S.T. , Ferkin M.H. , Johnson M.M. ( 2001). "The response of meadow voles to an over-mark in which the two donors differ in gonadal hormone status". — Anim. Behav. Vol 62: 1171- 1177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1853
35. Madison D.M. ( 1980). "Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 7: 65- 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00302520
36. Meek L.R. , Lee T.M. ( 1993). "Female meadow voles have a preferred mating pattern predicted by photoperiod, which influences fertility". — Physiol. Behav. Vol 54: 1201- 1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90349-K
37. Milligan S.R. ( 1982). "Induced ovulation in mammals". — Oxford Rev. Reprod. Biol. Vol 4: 1- 46.
38. Rich T.J. , Hurst J.L. ( 1998). "Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates". — Anim. Behav. Vol 56: 727- 735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0803
39. Rudd C.D. ( 1994). "Sexual behavior of male and female tammar wallabies ( Macropus eugenii) at post-partum oestrus". — J. Zool. (Lond.) Vol 232: 151- 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb01565.x
40. Vaughn A.A. , Ferkin M.H. ( 2011). "The presence and number of male competitor’s scent marks and female reproductive state affect the response of male meadow voles to female conspecifics’ odours". — Behaviour Vol 148: 927- 943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/000579511X584375
41. Witt D.M. , Carter C.S. , Chayer R. , Adams K. ( 1990). "Patterns of behavior during postpartum oestrus in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 39: 528- 534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80418-X
42. Wolff J.O. ( 1993). "Why are female small mammals territorial?"— Oikos Vol 68: 364- 370. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544853
43. Woodward R.L. Jr. , Schmick M.K. , Ferkin M.H. ( 1999). "Response of prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster(Rodentia, Arvicolidae), to scent over-marks of two same-sex conspecifics: a test of the scent-masking hypothesis". — Ethology Vol 105: 1009- 1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.10512482.x
44. Woodward R.L. , Bartos K. , Ferkin M.H. ( 2000). "Meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus) and prairie voles ( M. ochrogaster) differ in their responses to over-marks from opposite- and same-sex conspecifics". — Ethology Vol 106: 979- 992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00618.x
45. Ziegler T.E. , Wittwer D.J. , Snowdon C.T. ( 1993). "Circulating and excreted hormones during the ovarian cycle in the cotton-top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus ". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 31: 55- 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350310106
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00002999
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00002999
2012-01-01
2016-09-26

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation