Does personality explain variation in the probability of sexual cannibalism in the orb-web spider Argiope aurantia?
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals.
Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book
on the Brill platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s)
acquired by the Library. MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
Sexual cannibalism is often hypothesized to be an extreme manifestation of sexual conflict, yet we still lack a good understanding of the underlying motivation in most species. Hypotheses for the ultimate causes of sexual cannibalism either invoke the behavior as adaptive or mal-adaptive. Adaptive hypotheses consider foraging decisions, mate choice or genetic bet-hedging. Mal-adaptive hypotheses propose that sexual cannibalism is the result of mistaken species identity or the by-product of an aggression syndrome. Here, we test the latter hypothesis, that sexual cannibalism is the result of an aggression syndrome. This hypothesis states that aggressive behavior is favored in the foraging context because females benefit from achieving a large size quickly through an increase in fecundity, and it predicts that individuals that are aggressive foragers are more likely to attack a male and hence are at risk of receiving no or insufficient quantities of sperm. Few tests of this hypothesis are available to date, and only one involved a species with sexual cannibalism occurring after at least some sperm transfer. We test the hypothesis in Argiope aurantia, a species in which females frequently attack males during copulation. We estimated aggressiveness in the foraging context in penultimate and adults females and staged matings using the same females to evaluate whether aggressiveness during the foraging context predicts the likelihood of sexual cannibalism. Indeed, we find that aggressive foragers are more likely to attack their mates, but we conclude that other, possibly adaptive reasons for cannibalism exist as much of the uncertainty in cannibalism occurrence remained unexplained.
2. AndradeM.C.B. ( 1998). "Female hunger can explain variation in cannibalistic behavior despite male sacrifice in redback spiders". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 9: 33- 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/9.1.33
3. ArnqvistG. , HenrikssonS. ( 1997). "Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints". — Evol. Ecol. Vol 11: 255- 273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018412302621
4. BarryK.L. , HolwellG.I. , HerbersteinM.E. ( 2008). "Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 19: 710- 715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm156
5. BerningA.W. , GaddR.D.H. , SweeneyK. , MacDonaldL. , EngR.Y.Y. , HessZ.L. , PruittJ.N. ( 2012). "Sexual cannibalism is associated with female behavioural type, hunger state and increased hatching success". — Anim. Behav. Vol 84: 715- 721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.030
8. ElgarM.A. ( 1992). "Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates". — In: Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa( ElgarM.A. , CrespiB.J. , eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 128- 155.
9. ElgarM.A. , SchneiderJ.M. ( 2004). "Evolutionary significance of sexual cannibalism". — Adv. Stud. Behav. Vol 34: 135- 163.
10. FoelixR.F. ( 2010). Biology of spiders, 3rd edn.— Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
11. FoellmerM.W. ( 2008). "Broken genitals function as mating plugs and affect sex ratios in the orb-web spider Argiope aurantia ". — Evol. Ecol. Res. Vol 10: 449- 462.
12. FoellmerM.W. , FairbairnD.J. ( 2003). "Spontaneous male death during copulation in an orb-weaving spider". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 270: S183- S185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0042
13. FoellmerM.W. , FairbairnD.J. ( 2004). "Males under attack: sexual cannibalism and its consequences for male morphology and behaviour in an orb-weaving spider". — Evol. Ecol. Res. Vol 6: 1- 19.
19. HedrickA.V. , RiechertS.E. ( 1989). "Genetically-based variation between two spider populations in foraging behavior". — Oecologia Vol 80: 533- 539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00380078
20. HoskenD.J. , BlanckenhornW.U. ( 1999). "Female multiple mating, inbreeding avoidance, and fitness: it is not only the magnitude of costs and benefits that counts". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 10: 462- 464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/10.4.462
21. InkpenS.A. , FoellmerM.W. ( 2010). "Sex-specific foraging behaviours and growth rates in juveniles contribute to the development of extreme sexual size dimorphism in a spider". — Open Ecol. J. Vol 3: 59- 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003010059
22. JohnsonJ.C. ( 2001). "Sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders ( Dolomedes triton): an evaluation of two explanations for female aggression towards potential mates". — Anim. Behav. Vol 61: 905- 914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1679
23. JohnsonJ.C. , SihA. ( 2005). "Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders ( Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 58: 390- 396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0943-5
31. PruittJ.N. , RiechertS.E. , JonesT.C. ( 2008). "Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider, Anelosimus studiosus ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 76: 871- 879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.009
32. PruittJ.N. , RiechertS.E. , IturraldeG. , VegaM. , FitzpatrickB.M. , AvilésL. ( 2010). "Population differences in behaviour are explained by shared within-population trait correlations". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 23: 748- 756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01940.x
33. PruittJ.N. , IturraldeG. , AvilésL. , RiechertS.E. ( 2011). "Amazonian social spiders share similar within-colony behavioural variation and behavioural syndromes". — Anim. Behav. Vol 82: 1449- 1455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.030
34. Rabaneda-BuenoR. , Rodriguez-GironesM.A. , Aguado-de-la-PazS. , Fernández-MontravetaC. , De MasE. , WiseD.H. , Moya-Laran̋oJ. ( 2008). "Sexual cannibalism: high incidence in a natural population with benefits to females". — PLoS ONE Vol 3: e3484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003484
41. WhitlockM.C. , SchluterD. ( 2008). The analysis of biological data, 1st edn.— Roberts and Company, Greenwood Village, CO.
42. WilderS.M. , RypstraA.L. ( 2008a). "Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders". — Am. Nat. Vol 172: 431- 440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/589518