Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Plasticity in incubation behaviour under experimentally prolonged vulnerability to nest predation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Nest predation is the main cause of nest failures in many bird species. To counter this, birds have evolved different behavioural strategies to decrease the visibility of their nests, thus reducing the probability of nest detection. We manipulated the long-term perception of nest predation risk in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) by experimentally increasing the nest vulnerability to predators. We placed treatment and control nest-boxes for breeding pied flycatchers that appeared identical during the initial phase of breeding. But after the removal of a front panel, treatment boxes had an enlarged entrance hole, almost twice the initial diameter. This treatment increases actual predation risk and presumably parental perception of risk. Control boxes presented instead an entrance hole of the same size both before and after the manipulation. When breeding in enlarged entrance holes, females doubled the vigilance at the nest while males reduced the time spent at the nest, compared to pied flycatchers breeding in control boxes. Increased vulnerability of the nest site to predation risk, thus, induced pied flycatcher parents to increase nest vigilance while reducing their activity at the nest. These results highlight the existence of plasticity in incubation behaviours under long-term experimentally increased nest predation risk.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Finland

10.1163/1568539X-00003119
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003119
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003119
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Caro T. ( 2005). Antipredator defences in birds and mammals. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
2. Chalfoun A.D. , Martin T.E. ( 2007). "Latitudinal variation in avian incubation attentiveness and a test of the food limitation hypothesis". — Anim. Behav. Vol 73: 579- 585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.010
3. Chalfoun A.D. , Martin T.E. ( 2010). "Parental investment decisions in response to ambient nest-predation risk versus actual predation on the prior nest". — Condor Vol 112: 701- 710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.090242
4. Clutton-Brock T. ( 1991). The evolution of parental care. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Conway C.J. , Martin T.E. ( 2000a). "Effects of ambient temperature on avian incubation behavior". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 11: 178- 188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.2.178
6. Conway C.J. , Martin T.E. ( 2000b). "Evolution of passerine incubation behavior: influence of food, temperature, and nest predation". — Evolution Vol 54: 670- 685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00068.x
7. Creel S. , Winnie J.A. , Christianson D. , Liley S. ( 2008). "Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk". — Anim. Behav. Vol 76: 1139- 1146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.006
8. Cresswell W. ( 1997). "Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour". — Anim. Behav. Vol 53: 93- 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0281
9. Cresswell W. ( 2008). "Non-lethal effects of predation in birds". — Ibis Vol 150: 3- 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00793.x
10. Dale S. , Gustavsen R. , Slagsvold T. ( 1996). "Risk taking during parental care: a test of three hypotheses applied to the pied flycatcher". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 39: 31- 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050264
11. Fontaine J.J. , Martin T.E. ( 2006). "Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies". — Ecol. Lett. Vol 9: 428- 434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00892.x
12. Galvan I. , Sanz J.J. ( 2011). "Mate-feeding has evolved as a compensatory energetic strategy that affects breeding success in birds". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 22: 1088- 1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr094
13. Ghalambor C.K. , Martin T.E. ( 2000). "Parental investment strategies in two species of nuthatch vary with stage-specific predation risk and reproductive effort". — Anim. Behav. Vol 60: 263- 267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1472
14. Ghalambor C.K. , Martin T.E. ( 2002). "Comparative manipulation of predation risk in incubating birds reveals variability in the plasticity of responses". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 13: 101- 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.1.101
15. Hepp G.R. , Kennamer R.A. , Johnson M.H. ( 2006). "Maternal effects in Wood Ducks: incubation temperature influences incubation period and neonate phenotype". — Funct. Ecol. Vol 20: 307- 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01108.x
16. Ibáñez-Álamo J.D. , Soler M. ( 2012). "Predator-induced female behavior in the absence of male incubation feeding: an experimental study". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 66: 1067- 1073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1357-9
17. Korpimäki E. , Hakkarainen H. ( 2012). The boreal owl: ecology, behaviour and conservation of a forest-dwelling predator. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844164
18. Kovarik P. , Pavel V. ( 2011). "Does threat to the nest affect incubation rhythm in a small passerine?"— Ethology Vol 117: 181- 187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01865.x
19. Lifjeld J.T. , Slagsvold T. ( 1986). "The function of courtship feeding during incubation in the pied flycatcher Ficedula-hypoleuca ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 34: 1441- 1453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80215-9
20. Lima S.L. ( 2009). "Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation". — Biol. Rev. Vol 84: 485- 513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x
21. Londono G.A. , Levey D.J. , Robinson S.K. ( 2008). "Effects of temperature and food on incubation behaviour of the northern mockingbird, Mimus polyglottos ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 76: 669- 677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.002
22. Lyon B.E. , Montgomerie R.D. ( 1985). "Incubation feeding in snow buntings — female manipulation or indirect male parental care". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 17: 279- 284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00300147
23. Martin T.E. ( 1993). "Nest predation and nest sites". — BioScience Vol 43: 523- 532. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1311947
24. Martin T.E. , Ghalambor C.K. ( 1999). "Males feeding females during incubation. I. Required by microclimate or constrained by nest predation". — Am. Nat. Vol 153: 131- 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/303153
25. Martin T.E. , Scott J. , Menge C. ( 2000). "Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 267: 2287- 2293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1281
26. Martin T.E. , Briskie J.V. ( 2009). "Predation on dependent offspring a review of the consequences for mean expression and phenotypic plasticity in avian life history traits". — In: Year in evolutionary biology( Schlichting C.D. , Mousseau T.A. , eds). Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, p.  201- 217.
27. Martin T.E. , Arriero E. , Majewska A. ( 2011). "A trade-off between embryonic development rate and immune function of avian offspring is revealed by considering embryonic temperature". — Biol. Lett. Vol 7: 425- 428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.1031
28. Massaro M. , Starling-Windhof A. , Briskie J.V. , Martin T.E. ( 2008). "Introduced mammalian predators induce behavioural changes in parental care in an endemic New Zealand bird". — PlosOne Vol 3: e2331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002331
29. Montgomerie R.D. , Weatherhead P.J. ( 1988). "Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds". — Q. Rev. Biol. Vol 63: 167- 187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/415838
30. Morosinotto C. , Thomson R.L. , Hänninen M. , Korpimäki E. ( 2012). "Higher nest predation risk in association with a top predator: mesopredator attraction?"— Oecologia Vol 170: 507- 515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2320-1
31. Nilsson J.F. , Stjernman M. , Nilsson J.A. ( 2008). "Experimental reduction of incubation temperature affects both nestling and adult blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus ". — J. Avian Biol. Vol 39: 553- 559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04199.x
32. Požgayová M. , Procházka P. , Honza M. ( 2009). "Adjustment of incubation according to the threat posed: a further signal of enemy recognition in the Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla?"— J Ornithol. Vol 150: 569- 576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0384-4
33. Remeš V. ( 2005). "Nest concealment and parental behaviour interact in affecting nest survival in the blackcap ( Sylvia atricapilla): an experimental evaluation of the parental compensation hypothesis". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 58: 326- 333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0910-1
34. Scheiner S.M. ( 1993). "Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity". — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Vol 24: 35- 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.000343
35. Sofaer H.R. , Sillett T.S. , Peluc S.I. , Morrison S.A. , Ghalambor C.K. ( 2013). "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 24: 698- 707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars212
36. St Clair J.J.H. , Garcia-Pena G.E. , Woods R.W. , Szekely T. ( 2010). "Presence of mammalian predators decreases tolerance to human disturbance in a breeding shorebird". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 21: 1285- 1292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq144
37. Thomson R.L. , Forsman J.T. , Mönkkönen M. ( 2011). "Risk taking in natural predation risk gradients: support for risk allocation from breeding pied flycatchers". — Anim. Behav. Vol 82: 1443- 1447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.029
38. Travers M. , Clinchy M. , Zanette L. , Boonstra R. , Williams T.D. ( 2010). "Indirect predator effects on clutch size and the cost of egg production". — Ecol. Lett. Vol 13: 980- 988.
39. Walsberg G.E. , Schmidt C.A. ( 1992). "Effects of variable humidity on embryonic-development and hatching success of mourning doves". — Auk Vol 109: 309- 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4088199
40. Williams G.C. ( 1966). "Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle". — Am. Nat. Vol 100: 687- 690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/282461
41. Zanette L.Y. , White A.F. , Allen M.C. , Clinchy M. ( 2011). "Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year". — Science Vol 334: 1398- 1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210908
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003119
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003119
2013-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation