Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Puma communication behaviours: understanding functional use and variation among sex and age classes

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Intraspecific communication for mate selection sometimes varies between sexes based on different evolutionary life history patterns. Solitary felids use communication for territorial defence and location of mates, for which they use scent-marking behaviours including scraping, urine spraying, body rubbing, caterwauling, cheek rubbing, and the flehmen response, but these behaviours are not well understood in pumas (Puma concolor). We used motion-triggered video cameras to document the use of communication behaviours by male and female pumas, and used a series of experimental treatments to determine the mechanisms and importance of visual and olfactory cues in puma scrapes. We found that pumas use the physical scrape to locate communications, and then use urine to convey and interpret the communication itself. We also found significant differences among puma age and sex classes in the proportion of use and duration of time behaviours were displayed. Mature males spent significantly longer durations (x¯=22.1 s) on producing behaviours (scraping, body rubbing, and caterwauling behaviours) than mature females (x¯=3.3 s), and males used scraping (78.5%) and body rubbing (12.4%) behaviours at a higher proportion of visits than females (13.6 and 2.7%, respectively). Mature females spent significantly longer durations (x¯=30.4 s) on consuming behaviours (investigating and flehmen response behaviours) than mature males (x¯=13.7 s), and females used flehmen response (30.6%) and caterwauling (9.3%) behaviours at a higher proportion of visits than mature males (6.5% flehmen and 0.4% caterwauling). Male reproductive strategy appears based on advertisement for possible mates, while female reproductive strategy appears based on assessment of possible mates. The use of communication behaviours also appears to develop with age, as immature pumas rarely visited and acted as non-participants in communication behaviours.

Affiliations: 1: aSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; 2: bCenter for Integrated Spatial Research, Environmental Studies Department, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA

10.1163/1568539X-00003173
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003173
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003173
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Ashman D. , Christensen G.C. , Hess M.L. , Tsukamoto G.K. , Wickersham M.S. ( 1983). The mountain lion in Nevada, final report for project W-48-15. — Nevada Game and Fish Department, Reno, NV.
2. Bailey T.N. ( 1993). The African leopard: ecology and behavior of a solitary felid. — Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ.
3. Breed M.D. , Moore J. ( 2011). Animal behavior. — Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
4. Choate D.M. , Wolfe M.L. , Stoner D.C. ( 2006). "Evaluation of cougar population estimators in Utah". — Wild. Soc. Bull. Vol 34: 782- 799. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[782:EOCPEI]2.0.CO;2
5. Cohen J. ( 1992). "A power primer". — Psych. Bull. Vol 112: 155- 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
6. Cougar Management Working Group( 2005). Cougar management guidelines. — Wild Futures, Bainbridge Island, WA.
7. Currier M.J.P. ( 1983). "Felis concolor". — Mamm. Spec. Vol 200: 1- 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3503951
8. Davies N.B. , Krebs J.R. , West S.A. ( 2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology. — Wiley-Blackwell, New York, NY.
9. de Boer J.N. ( 1977). "The age of olfactory cues functioning in chemocommunication among male domestic cats". — Behav. Proc. Vol 2: 209- 225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(77)90026-2
10. Elbroch L.M. ( 2003). Mammal tracks and sign: a guide to North American species. — Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA.
11. Gunderson H.L. ( 1976). Mammalogy. — McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
12. Harmsen B.J. , Foster R.J. , Gutierrez S.M. , Marin S.Y. , Doncaster C.P. ( 2010). "Scrape-marking behavior of jaguars ( Panthera onca) and pumas ( Puma concolor)". — J. Mamm. Vol 91: 1225- 1234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-416.1
13. Hurst J.L. , Benyon R.J. ( 2004). "Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice". — BioEssays Vol 26: 1288- 1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20147
14. Kelly M.J. , Noss A.J. , DiBitetti M.S. , Maffei L. , Arispe R.L. , Paviolo A. , DeAngelo C.D. , DiBlanco Y.E. ( 2008). "Estimating puma densities from camera trapping across three study sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize". — J. Mamm. Vol 89: 408- 418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-424R.1
15. Laundré J.W. , Hernandez L. , Streubel D. , Altendorf K. , Gonzalez C.L. ( 2000). "Aging mountain lions using gum-line recession". — Wild. Soc. Bull. Vol 28: 963- 966.
16. Logan K. , Sweanor L. ( 2001). Desert puma: evolutionary ecology and conservation of an enduring carnivore. — Island Press, Covelo, CA.
17. Logan K. , Sweanor L. ( 2010). "Behavior and social organization of a solitary carnivore". — In: Cougar: ecology and conservation( Hornocker M. , Negri S. , eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  105- 117.
18. Long E.S. , Feckske D.M. , Sweitzer R.A. , Jenks J.A. , Pierce B.M. , Bleich V.C. ( 2003). "Efficacy of photographic scent stations to detect mountain lions". — West. Nor. Am. Nat. Vol 63: 529- 532.
19. Mayer K.E. , Laundenslayer W.F. (eds) ( 1988). A guide to wildlife habitats in California. — State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA.
20. McBride R. , McBride C. ( 2010). "Florida panther flehmen response recorded at baited trail camera site". — Southeast. Nat. Vol 9: 629- 631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/058.009.0319
21. McBride R. , Sensor R. ( 2012). "Photographic evidence of wild Florida panthers scent-marking with facial glands". — Southeast. Nat. Vol 11: 349- 354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/058.011.0216
22. Mellen J.D. ( 1993). "A comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in, 20 species of small cats". — Am. Zool. Vol 33: 151- 166.
23. Meyer D. , Zeileis A. , Hornik K. ( 2013). vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. — R package version 1.3-1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
24. Pinheiro J. , Bates D. , DebRoy S. , Sarkar D. and R Core Team( 2013). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-107.
25. R Core Team( 2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
26. Ruth T.K. , Murphy K. ( 2010). "Competition with other carnivores for prey". — In: Cougar: ecology and conservation( Hornocker M. , Negri S. , eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  163- 172.
27. Seidensticker J.C. IV , Hornocker M.G. , Wiles W.V. , Messick J.P. ( 1973). "Mountain lion social organization in the Idaho primitive area". — Wild Monogr. Vol 35: 3- 60.
28. Smith J.L.D. , McDougal C. , Miquelle D. ( 1989). "Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 37: 1- 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8
29. Sokal R.S. , Rohlf F.J. ( 1987). Introduction to biostatistics. — W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
30. Sunquist M. , Sunquist F. ( 2002). Wild cats of the world. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
31. Thonhauser K.E. , Raveh S. , Hettyey A. , Beissmann H. , Penn D.J. ( 2013). "Scent marking increases male reproductive success in wild house mice". — Anim. Behav. Vol 86: 1013- 1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.004
32. Verberne G. , Leyhausen P. ( 1976). "Marking behaviour of some viverridae and felidae: time-interval analysis of the marking pattern". — Behaviour Vol 58: 192- 253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853976X00172
33. Walker S. , Novaro A. ( 2010). "The world’s southernmost pumas in Patagonia and the southern Andes". — In: Cougar: ecology and conservation( Hornocker M. , Negri S. , eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  91- 99.
34. Wilmers C.C. , Wang Y. , Nickel B. , Houghtaling P. , Shakeri Y. , Allen M.L. , Kermish-Wells J. , Yovovich V. , Williams T. ( 2013). "Scale dependent behavioral responses to human development by a large predator, the puma". — PLoS One Vol 8: e60590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060590
35. Yule G.U. ( 1912). "On the methods of measuring the association between two attributes". — J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Vol 75: 579- 652. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2340126
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003173
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003173
2014-01-01
2017-11-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation