Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Male body size and parental relatedness but not nuptial colouration influence paternity success during scramble competition in Rana arvalis

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Female mate choice promotes the development of male secondary sexual traits such as nuptial colouration, whereas scramble competition favours male traits which enhance their ability for access to females. In the explosively breeding moor frog (Rana arvalis), males express a conspicuous blue colouration during a short reproductive period characterised by scramble competition. In the present study we used controlled mating experiments and genetic markers to disentangle the effects of colouration, body size and pairwise genetic relatedness in determining paternity success. Males observed in amplexus with a female prior to spawning were larger than their competitors but did not differ from them in colouration. Polyandry occurred in 67% of the 18 analysed egg clutches, and amplecting males did not always achieve the highest siring success, most likely due to stray sperm. Successful mating pairs were characterised by higher genetic divergence between them than expected by chance. We confirm previous evidence that male nuptial colouration is not a trait selected by females, and provide evidence that male reproductive success is influenced by male size as well as genetic attributes.

Affiliations: 1: aDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; 2: bSchool of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK

10.1163/1568539X-00003220
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003220
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003220
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Andersson M. ( 1994). Sexual selection. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Andersson M. , Iwasa Y. ( 1996). "Sexual selection". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 11: 53- 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1
3. Arak A. ( 1983). "Male–male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians". — In: Mate choice( Bateson P. , ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.  181- 210.
4. Arens P. , Sluis T. , Van’t Westende W.P.C. , Vosman B. , Vos C.C. , Smulders M.J.M. ( 2007). "Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog ( Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands". — Landscape Ecol. Vol 22: 1489- 1500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9132-4
5. Bell R.C. , Zamudio K.R. ( 2012). "Sexual dichromatism in frogs: natural selection, sexual selection and unexpected diversity". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 279: 4687- 4693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1609
6. Berger L. , Rybacki M. ( 1992). "Sperm competition in European water frogs". — Alytes (Paris) Vol 10: 113- 116.
7. Berven A.K. ( 1981). "Mate choice in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica ". — Evolution Vol 35: 707- 722. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408242
8. Bolker B.M. , Brooks M.E. , Clark C.J. , Geange S.W. , Poulsen J.R. , Stevens M.H.H. , White J.-S.S. ( 2009). "Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 24: 127- 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
9. Burnham K.P. , Anderson D.R. ( 2002). Model selection and inference, a practical information-theoretic approach. — Springer, New York, NY.
10. Byrne P.G. , Roberts J.D. ( 2004). "Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs ( Crinia georgiana)". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 15: 872- 882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh100
11. Crawley M.J. ( 2007). The R book. — Wiley, Chichester. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470515075
12. Davies N.B. , Halliday T.R. ( 1977). "Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo ". — Nature Vol 269: 56- 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/269056a0
13. Edwards D.L. , Mahony M.J. , Clulow J. ( 2004). "Effect of sperm concentration, medium osmolality and oocyte storage on artificial fertilisation success in a myobatrachid frog ( Limnodynastes tasmaniensis)". — Reprod. Fertil. Dev. Vol 16: 347- 354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD02079
14. Gerhardt H.C. , Huber F. ( 2002). Acoustic communication in Insects and Anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Glandt D. ( 2006). Der Moorfrosch — Einheit und Vielfalt einer Braunfroschart. — Laurenti Verlag, Bielefeld.
16. Gomez D. ( 2006). AVICOL, a program to analyse spectrometric data. — Free program, available online at ( accessed 3 August 2012).
17. Gomez D. , Richardson C. , Lengagne T. , Plenet S. , Joly P. , Léna J.-P. , Théry M. ( 2009). "The role of nocturnal vision in mate choice: females prefer conspicuous males in the European tree frog ( Hyla arborea)". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 276: 2351- 2358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0168
18. Grafe T.U. , Preininger D. , Sztatecsny M. , Kasah R. , Dehling J.M. , Proksch S. , Hödl W. ( 2012). "Multimodal communication in a noisy environment: a case study of the Bornean rock frog Staurois parvus ". — Plos One Vol 7: e37965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037965
19. Greene A.E. , Funk W.C. ( 2009). "Sexual selection on morphology in an explosive breeding amphibian, the Columbia spotted frog ( Rana luteiventris)". — J. Herpetol. Vol 43: 244- 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/08-112R.1
20. Hedengren I. ( 1987). Selection of body size, arm length and colour in male and female moor frogs ( Rana arvalis ). — University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
21. Hettyey A. , Roberts J.D. ( 2006). "Sperm traits of the quacking frog, Crinia georgiana: intra- and interpopulation variation in a species with a high risk of sperm competition". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 59: 389- 396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0062-3
22. Hettyey A. , Roberts J.D. ( 2007). "Sperm traits in the quacking frog ( Crinia georgiana), a species with plastic alternative mating tactics". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 61: 1303- 1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0361-y
23. Hettyey A. , Baksay S. , Vagi B. , Hoi H. ( 2009a). "Counterstrategies by female frogs to sexual coercion by heterospecifics". — Anim. Behav. Vol 78: 1365- 1372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.006
24. Hettyey A. , Herczeg G. , Hoi H. ( 2009b). "Testing the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis in male moor frogs ( Rana arvalis) exhibiting a conspicuous nuptial colouration". — Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 30: 581- 586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853809789647086
25. Hettyey A. , Herczeg G. , Laurila A. , Crochet P.-A. , Merila J. ( 2009c). "Body temperature, size, nuptial colouration and mating success in male moor frogs ( Rana arvalis)". — Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 30: 37- 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853809787392784
26. Hill G.E. ( 1991). "Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality". — Nature Vol 350: 337- 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/350337a0
27. Höglund J. ( 1989). "Pairing and spawning patterns in the common toad, Bufo bufo— the effects of sex-ratios and the time available for male–male competition". — Anim. Behav. Vol 38: 423- 429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80035-1
28. Höglund J. , Robertson J.G.M. ( 1987). "Random mating by size in a population of common toads Bufo bufo ". — Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 8: 321- 330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853887X00108
29. Höglund J. , Robertson J.G.M. ( 1988). "Chorusing behavior, a density-dependent alternative mating strategy in male common toads ( Bufo bufo)". — Ethology Vol 79: 324- 332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1988.tb00721.x
30. Höglund J. , Säterberg L. ( 1989). "Sexual selection in common toads: correlates with age and body size". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 2: 367- 372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1989.2050367.x
31. Howard R.D. ( 1988). "Sexual selection on male body size and mating behaviour in American toads, Bufo americanus ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 36: 1796- 1808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80119-2
32. Jehle R. , Sztatecsny M. , Wolf J.B.W. , Whitlock A. , Hödl W. , Burke T. ( 2007). "Genetic dissimilarity predicts paternity in the smooth newt ( Lissotriton vulgaris)". — Biol. Lett. Vol 3: 526- 528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0311
33. Kalinowski S.T. , Taper M.L. , Marshall T.C. ( 2007). "Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment". — Mol. Ecol. Notes Vol 16: 1099- 1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x
34. Knopp T. , Merila J. ( 2009). "Multiple paternity in the moor frog, Rana arvalis ". — Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 30: 515- 521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853809789647112
35. Krupa J.J. ( 1994). "Breeding biology of the great-plains toad in Oklahoma". — J. Herpetol. Vol 28: 217- 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1564623
36. Kvarnemo C. , Simmons L.W. ( 2013). "Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating". — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 368: 20120042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0042
37. Lane J.E. , Boutin S. , Gunn M.R. , Coltman D.W. ( 2009). "Sexually selected behaviour: red squirrel males search for reproductive success". — J. Anim. Ecol. Vol 78: 296- 304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01502.x
38. Laurila A. , Seppä P. ( 1998). "Multiple paternity in the common frog ( Rana temporaria): genetic evidence from tadpole kin groups". — Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Vol 63: 221- 232.
39. Liao W.B. , Lu X. ( 2011a). "Male mating success in the Omei treefrog ( Rhacophorus omeimontis): the influence of body size and age". — Belg. J. Zool. Vol 141: 3- 12.
40. Liao W.B. , Lu X. ( 2011b). "Proximate mechanisms leading to large male-mating advantage in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi ". — Behaviour Vol 148: 1087- 1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/000579511X589848
41. Loman J. , Madsen T. ( 1986). "Reproductive tactics of large and small male toads Bufo bufo ". — Oikos Vol 46: 57- 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565380
42. Marmet J. , Pisanu B. , Chapuis J.-L. , Jacob G. , Baudry E. ( 2012). "Factors affecting male and female reproductive success in a chipmunk ( Tamias sibiricus) with a scramble competition mating system". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 66: 1449- 1457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1399-z
43. Milinski M. , Bakker T.C.M. ( 1990). "Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males". — Nature Vol 344: 330- 333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/344330a0
44. Murphy C.G. ( 1998). "Interaction-independent sexual selection and the mechanisms of sexual selection". — Evolution Vol 52: 8- 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2410915
45. Narins P.M. , Hödl W. , Grabul D.S. ( 2003). "Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis ". — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol 100: 577- 580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0237165100
46. Polo-Cavia N. , López P. , Martín J. ( 2013). "Head coloration reflects health state in the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans ". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 67: 153- 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1435-z
47. Preininger D. , Boeckle M. , Freudmann A. , Starnberger I. , Sztatecsny M. , Hödl W. ( 2013). "Multimodal signaling in the small torrent frog ( Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 67: 1449- 1456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1489-6
48. R Development Core Team( 2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.1.0. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, available online at: ( accessed 10 April 2014).
49. Ries C. , Spaethe J. , Sztatecsny M. , Strondl C. , Hödl W. ( 2008). "Turning blue and ultraviolet: sex-specific colour change during mating season in the Balkan moor frog". — J. Zool. (Lond.) Vol 276: 229- 236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00456.x
50. Roberts J.D. , Byrne P.G. ( 2011). "Polyandry, sperm competition, and the evolution of anuran amphibians". — Adv. Stud. Behav. Vol 43: 1- 53.
51. Ryser J. ( 1989). "Weight loss, reproductive output, and the cost of reproduction in the common frog, Rana temporaria ". — Oecologia Vol 78: 264- 268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00377165
52. Schwagmeyer P.L. , Woontner S.J. ( 1986). "Scramble competition polygyny in thirteen-lined ground squirrels: the relative contributions of overt conflict and competitive mate searching". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 19: 359- 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00295709
53. Seehausen O. , van Alphen J.J.M. ( 1998). "The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids ( Haplochromis nyererei complex)". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 42: 1- 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050405
54. Sheldon B.C. , Arponen H. , Laurila A. , Crochet P.A. , Merilä J. ( 2003). "Sire coloration influences offspring survival under predation risk in the moorfrog". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 16: 1288- 1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00606.x
55. Sherman C.D.H. , Uller T. , Wapstra E. , Olsson M. ( 2008). "Within-population variation in ejaculate characteristics in a prolonged breeder, Peron’s tree frog, Litoria peronii ". — Naturwissenschaften Vol 95: 1055- 1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0423-7
56. Sherman C.D.H. , Sagvik J. , Olsson M. ( 2010). "Female choice for males with greater fertilisation success in the Swedish moor frog, Rana arvalis ". — Plos One Vol 5: e13634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013634
57. Sztatecsny M. , Jehle R. , Burke T. , Hödl W. ( 2006). "Female polyandry under male harassment: the case of the common toad ( Bufo bufo)". — J. Zool. (Lond.) Vol 270: 517- 522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00120.x
58. Sztatecsny M. , Strondl C. , Baierl A. , Ries C. , Hödl W. ( 2010). "Chin up: are the bright throats of male common frogs a condition-independent visual cue?"— Anim. Behav. Vol 79: 779- 786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.003
59. Sztatecsny M. , Preininger D. , Freudmann A. , Loretto M.-C. , Maier F. , Hödl W. ( 2012). "Don’t get the blues: conspicuous nuptial colouration of male moor frogs ( Rana arvalis) supports visual mate recognition during scramble competition in large breeding aggregations". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 66: 1587- 1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1412-6
60. Taylor R.C. , Buchanan B.W. , Doherty J.L. ( 2007). "Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice". — Anim. Behav. Vol 74: 1753- 1763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.010
61. Vieites D.R. , Nieto-Roma S. , Barluenga M. , Palanca A. , Vences M. , Meyer A. ( 2004). "Post-mating clutch piracy in an amphibian". — Nature Vol 431: 305- 307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02879
62. Wang J. ( 2002). "An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers". — Genetics Vol 160: 1203- 1215.
63. Wang J. ( 2011). "COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients". — Mol. Ecol. Resour. Vol 11: 141- 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02885.x
64. Wang J. , Santure A.W. ( 2009). "Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy". — Genetics Vol 181: 1579- 1594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.100214
65. Wells K.D. ( 2007). The ecology and behavior of amphibians. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226893334.001.0001
66. Zamudio K.R. , Chan L.M. ( 2008). "Alternative reproductive tactics in amphibians". — In: Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach( Oliveira R.F. , Taborsky M. , Brockmann H.J. , eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003220
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003220
2014-10-14
2017-12-14

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation