Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Recognition of familiarity on the basis of howls: a playback experiment in a captive group of wolves

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Playback experiments were conducted with a pack of captive Iberian wolves. We used a habituation–discrimination paradigm to test wolves’ ability to discriminate howls based on: (1) artificial manipulation of acoustic parameters of howls and (2) the identity of howling individuals. Manipulations in fundamental frequency and frequency modulation within the natural range of intra-individual howl variation did not elicit dishabituation, while manipulation of modulation pattern did produce dishabituation. With respect to identity, across trials wolves habituated to unfamiliar howls by a familiar wolf (i.e., no direct contact, but previous exposure to howls by this wolf), but not to unfamiliar howls from unfamiliar wolves (i.e., no direct contact and no previous exposure to howls by these wolves). Modulation pattern seems to be an important bioacoustic feature for individual recognition. Overall, our results provide the first experimental evidence that wolves can discriminate individuals based on the acoustic structure of their howls.

Affiliations: 1: aInstituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 2: bFonoteca Zoológica, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain

10.1163/1568539X-00003244
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003244
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003244
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Bee M.A. , Gerhardt H.C.C. ( 2001). "Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs ( Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis". — Anim. Behav. Vol 62: 1129- 1140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1851
2. Blumstein D.T. , Daniel J.C. ( 2004). "Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate between the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to calls from juveniles". — Anim. Behav. Vol 68: 1257- 1265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.024
3. Boitani L. ( 2000). Action plan for the conservation of the wolves ( Canis lupus) in Europe, Nature and environment, No. 113. — Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
4. Bradbury J.W. , Vehrencamp S.L. ( 2010). Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn.Sinnauer Associates, Sutherland, MA.
5. Charlton B.D. , Huang Y. , Swaisgood R.R. ( 2009). "Vocal discrimination of potential mates by female giant pandas ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca)". — Biol. Lett. Vol 5: 597- 599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0331
6. Charrier I. , Mathevon N. , Jouventin P. ( 2003). "Vocal signature recognition of mothers by fur seal pups". — Anim. Behav. Vol 65: 543- 550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2073
7. Demma D.J. , Mech L.D. ( 2009). "Wolf use of summer territory in Northeastern Minnesota". — J. Wildl. Managem. Vol 73: 380- 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2008-114
8. Falls J.B. ( 1982). "Individual recognition by sounds in birds". — In: Acoustic communication in birds, Vol Vol. 2( Kroodsma D.H. , Miller E.H. , eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p.  237- 278.
9. Fitch W.T. , Kelley P. ( 2000). "Perception of vocal tract resonances by whooping cranes Grus americana ". — Ethology Vol 106: 559- 574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00572.x
10. Friedman S. ( 1972). "Habituation and recovery of visual response in the alert human newborn". — J. Exp. Child Psychol. Vol 13: 339- 349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90095-1
11. Frommolt K.-H.H. , Goltsman M.E. , Macdonald D.W. ( 2003). "Barking foxes, Alopex lagopus: field experiments in individual recognition in a territorial mammal". — Anim. Behav. Vol 65: 509- 518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2064
12. Gazzola A. , Avanzinelli E. , Mauri L. , Scandura M. , Apollonio M. ( 2002). "Temporal changes of howling in south European wolf packs". — Ital. J. Zool. Vol 69: 157- 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11250000209356454
13. Goodmann P.A. , Klinghammer E. , Willard J. ( 2002). Wolf ethogram (Revised 2002). — Eckhard H. Hess Institute of Ethology, Battle Ground, IN.
14. Harrington F.H. ( 1986). "Timber wolf howling playback studies: discrimination of pup from adult howls". — Anim. Behav. Vol 34: 1575- 1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80231-7
15. Harrington F.H. ( 1987). "Agressive howling in wolves". — Anim. Behav. Vol 35: 1575- 1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80204-X
16. Harrington F.H. , Asa C.S. ( 2003). "Wolf communication". — In: Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation( Mech L.D. , Boitani L. , eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  66- 103.
17. Harrington F.H. , Mech L.D. ( 1978). "Wolf vocalization". — In: Wolf and man: evolution in parallel( Hall R.L. , Sharp H.S. , eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p.  109- 132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-319250-9.50014-1
18. Harrington F.H. , Mech L.D. ( 1979). "Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance". — Behaviour Vol 68: 207- 249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853979X00322
19. Kazial K.A. , Kenny T.L. , Burnett S.C. ( 2008). "Little brown bats ( Myotis lucifugus) recognize individual identity of conspecifics using sonar calls". — Ethology Vol 114: 469- 478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01483.x
20. Knörnschild M. , Feifel M. , Kalko E.K.V. ( 2013). "Mother-offspring recognition in the bat Carollia perspicillata ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 86: 941- 948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.08.011
21. Kroodsma D.E. , Byers B.E. , Goodale E. , Johnson S. , Liu W.-C.C. ( 2001). "Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later". — Anim. Behav. Vol 61: 1029- 1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1676
22. LaDage L. , Ferkin M. ( 2006). "Male leopard geckos ( Eublepharis macularius) can discriminate between two familiar females". — Behaviour Vol 143: 1033- 1049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853906778623644
23. Lehner P.N. ( 1996). Handbook of ethological methods. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. McComb K. , Moss C. , Sayialel S. , Baker L. ( 2000). "Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants". — Anim. Behav. Vol 59: 1103- 1109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1406
25. McGregor P.K. ( 2000). "Playback experiments: design and analysis". — Acta Ethol. Vol 3: 3- 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s102110000023
26. Mech L.D. ( 1970). The wolf: the ecology and behavior of an endangered species. — The Natural History Press, Garden City, NY.
27. Mech L.D. , Boitani L. ( 2003). "Wolf social ecology". — In: Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation( Mech L.D. , Boitani L. , eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  1- 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226516981.001.0001
28. Molles L.E. , Vehrencamp S.L. ( 2001). "Neighbour recognition by resident males in the banded wren, Thryothorus pleurostictus, a tropical songbird with high song type sharing". — Anim. Behav. Vol 61: 119- 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1561
29. Molnár C. , Pongrácz P. , Faragó T. , Dóka A. , Miklosi A. ( 2009). "Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller". — Behav. Proc. Vol 82: 198- 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.011
30. Packard J.M. ( 2003). "Wolf behavior: reproductive, social, and intelligent". — In: Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation( Mech L.D. , Boitani L. , eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  35- 65.
31. Palacios V. , Mech L.D. ( 2011). "Problems with studying wolf predation on small prey in summer via global positioning system collars". — Eur. J. Wildlife Res. Vol 57: 149- 156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0408-7
32. Palacios V. , Font E. , Márquez R. ( 2007). "Iberian wolf howls: acoustic structure, individual variation, and a comparison with North American populations". — J. Mammal. Vol 88: 606- 613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-151R1.1
33. R Development Core Team( 2010). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Development Core Team, Vienna.
34. Raemaekers J.J. , Raemaekers P.M. ( 1985). "Field playback of loud calls to gibbons ( Hylobates lar): territorial, sex-specific and species-specific responses". — Anim. Behav. Vol 33: 481- 493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80071-3
35. Reby D. , Hewison M. , Izquierdo M. , Pepin D. ( 2001). "Red deer ( Cervus elaphus) hinds discriminate between the roars of their current harem-holder stag and those of neighbouring stags". — Ethology Vol 107: 951- 959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00732.x
36. Rendall D. , Rodman P.S. , Emond R.E. ( 1996). "Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys". — Anim. Behav. Vol 51: 1007- 1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0103
37. Searby A. , Jouventin P. ( 2003). "Mother-lamb acoustic recognition in sheep: a frequency coding". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 270: 1765- 1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2442
38. Searby A. , Jouventin P. , Aubin T. ( 2004). "Acoustic recognition in macaroni penguins: an original signature system". — Anim. Behav. Vol 67: 615- 625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.03.012
39. Searcy W.A. ( 1989). "Pseudoreplication, external validity and the design of playback experiments". — Anim. Behav. Vol 38: 715- 717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80019-3
40. Shalter M.D. , Fentress J.C. , Young G.W. ( 1977). "Determinants of response of wolf pups to auditory signals". — Behaviour Vol 60: 98- 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853977X00298
41. Sharpe L.L. , Hill A. , Cherry M.I. ( 2013). "Individual recognition in a wild cooperative mammal using contact calls". — Anim. Behav. Vol 86: 893- 900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.023
42. Shettleworth S.J. ( 2010). Cognition, evolution, and behavior, 2nd edn.Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
43. Slabbekoorn H. , ten Cate C. ( 1998). "Perceptual tuning to frequency characteristics of territorial signals in collared doves". — Anim. Behav. Vol 56: 847- 857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0887
44. Sousa-Lima R.S. , Paglia A.P. , Da Fonseca G.A.B. ( 2002). "Signature information and individual recognition in the isolation calls of Amazonian manatees, Trichechus inunguis(Mammalia: Sirenia)". — Anim. Behav. Vol 63: 301- 310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1873
45. Thom M.D. , Hurst J.L. ( 2004). "Individual recognition by scent". — Ann. Zool. Fenn. Vol 41: 765- 787.
46. Tibbetts E.A. , Dale J. ( 2007). "Individual recognition: it is good to be different". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 22: 529- 537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001
47. Tibbetts E.A. , Sheehan M.J. , Dale J. ( 2008). "A testable definition of individual recognition". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 23: 356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.007
48. Tooze Z.J. , Harrington F.H. , Fentress J.C. ( 1990). "Individually distinct vocalizations in timber wolves, Canis lupus ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 40: 723- 730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80701-8
49. Weiss D.J. , Hauser M.D. ( 2002). "Perception of harmonics in the combination long call of cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 64: 415- 426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3083
50. Wilson D.R. , Mennill D.J. ( 2010). "Black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus, can use individually distinctive songs to discriminate among conspecifics". — Anim. Behav. Vol 79: 1267- 1275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.028
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003244
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003244
2015-03-20
2017-11-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation