Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Female mate choice, differential allocation and parent–offspring covariation in canaries

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Parental care typically involves elaborate reciprocal within-family interactions, and traits such as parental provisioning and offspring begging should therefore coevolve. There is indeed mounting evidence for a phenotypic covariation, also in the canary ( Serinus canaria), our model species. Such covariation may arise due to maternal effects, rendering this relationship particularly sensitive to environmental conditions. Here, we manipulated the social environment by pairing females with either their chosen or non-chosen male. Subsequently, all clutches were cross-fostered to separate pre- and postnatal effects. We found a positive covariation between offspring begging and parental provisioning, which was, however, unaffected by mate preferences, and we found no evidence for differential allocation. In addition, there was no effect of assortative mating, which is thought to reinforce parent–offspring covariation. The fact that parent–offspring covariation is consistently observed in canaries suggests that it is biologically relevant, but it requires further studies to elucidate its sensitivity to environmental variation.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology-Ethology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium

10.1163/1568539X-00003282
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003282
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003282
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Agrawal A.F. , Brodie E.D. , Brown J. ( 2001). "Parent–offspring coadaptation and the dual genetic control of maternal care". — Science Vol 292: 1710- 1712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1059910
2. Bengtsson H. , Rydén O. ( 1983). "Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major ". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 12: 243- 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00290777
3. Burley N. ( 1988). "The differential-allocation hypothesis — an experimental test". — Am. Nat. Vol 132: 611- 628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/284877
4. Christians J.K. ( 2002). "Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals". — Biol. Rev. Vol 77: 1- 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005784
5. Curley J.P. , Barton S. , Surani A. , Keverne E.B. ( 2004). "Coadaptation in mother and infant regulated by a paternally expressed imprinted gene". — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Vol 271: 1303- 1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2725
6. Estramil N. , Eens M. , Müller W. ( 2013). "Coadaptation of offspring begging and parental provisioning — an evolutionary ecological perspective on avian family life". — PLoS ONE Vol 8: e70463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/annotation/cffd172a-2937-4705-aa1f-20de7cb029b0
7. Estramil N. , Eens M. , Müller W. ( 2014a). "On the coadaptation of offspring begging and parental supply — a within-individual approach across life stages". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 68: 1481- 1491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1756-1
8. Estramil N. , Eens M. , Müller W. ( 2014b). "Cross-fostering mismatches parent–offspring behaviors but this does not entail costs to family life". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 68: 1019- 1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1714-y
9. Garcia-Fernandez V. , Draganoiu T.I. , Ung D. , Lacroix A. , Malacarne G. , Leboucher G. ( 2013). "Female canaries invest more in response to an exaggerated male trait". — Anim. Behav. Vol 85: 679- 684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.007
10. Gil D. , Leboucher G. , Lacroix A. , Cue R. , Kreutzer M. ( 2004). "Female canaries produce eggs with greater amounts of testosterone when exposed to preferred male song". — Horm. Behav. Vol 45: 64- 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.08.005
11. Gowaty P.A. ( 2008). "Reproductive compensation". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 21: 1189- 1200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01559.x
12. Gowaty P.A. , Anderson W.W. , Bluhm C.K. , Drickamer L.C. , Kim Y.K. , Moore A.J. ( 2007). "The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability". — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol 104: 15023- 15027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706622104
13. Griffiths R. , Double M.C. , Orr K. , Dawson R.J.G. ( 1998). "A DNA test to sex most birds". — Mol. Ecol. Vol 7: 1071- 1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x
14. Groothuis T.G.G. , Müller W. , von Engelhardt N. , Carere C. , Eising C. ( 2005). "Maternal hormones as a tool to adjust offspring phenotype in avian species". — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. Vol 29: 329- 352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.002
15. Gustafsson L. , Sutherland W.J. ( 1988). "The costs of reproduction in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis ". — Nature Vol 335: 813- 815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/335813a0
16. Hager R. , Johnstone R.A. ( 2003). "The genetic basis of family conflict resolution in mice". — Nature Vol 421: 533- 535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01239
17. Hinde C.A. , Buchanan K.L. , Kilner R.M. ( 2009). "Prenatal environmental effects match offspring begging to parental provisioning". — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Vol 276: 2787- 2794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0375
18. Hinde C.A. , Johnstone R.A. , Kilner R.M. ( 2010). "Parent–offspring conflict and coadaptation". — Science Vol 327: 1373- 1376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1186056
19. Horvathova T. , Nakagawa S. , Uller T. ( 2012). "Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 279: 163- 170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0663
20. Isaksson C. , Uller T. , Andersson S. ( 2006). "Parental effects on carotenoid-based plumage coloration in nestling great tits, Parus major ". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 60: 556- 562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0200-6
21. Johnsen A. , Delhey K. , Schlicht E. , Peters A. , Kempenaers B. ( 2005). "Male sexual attractiveness and parental effort in blue tits: a test of the differential allocation hypothesis". — Anim. Behav. Vol 70: 877- 888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.005
22. Kilner R.M. ( 2001). "A growth cost of begging in captive canary chicks". — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol 98: 11394- 11398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191221798
23. Kölliker M. ( 2005). "Ontogeny in the family". — Behav. Genet. Vol 35: 7- 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-004-0852-9
24. Kölliker M. , Brodie E.D. , Moore A.J. ( 2005). "The coadaptation of parental supply and offspring demand". — Am. Nat. Vol 166: 506- 516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/491687
25. Kölliker M. , Royle N.J. , Smiseth P.T. ( 2012). "Parent–offspring co-adaptation". — In: The evolution of parental care( Royle N.J. , Smiseth P.T. , Kölliker M. , eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.  285- 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692576.003.0016
26. Krist M. ( 2011). "Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds". — Biol. Rev. Vol 86: 692- 716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00166.x
27. Leonard M.L. , Horn A.G. ( 1998). "Need and nestmates affect begging in tree swallows". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 42: 431- 436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050457
28. Limbourg T. , Mateman A.C. , Andersson S. , Lessells C.M. ( 2004). "Female blue tits adjust parental effort to manipulated male UV attractiveness". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 271: 1903- 1908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2825
29. Lock J.E. , Smiseth P.T. , Moore A.J. ( 2004). "Selection, inheritance, and the evolution of parent–offspring interactions". — Am. Nat. Vol 164: 13- 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/421444
30. Lock J.E. , Smiseth P.T. , Moore P.J. , Moore A.J. ( 2007). "Coadaptation of prenatal and postnatal maternal effects". — Am. Nat. Vol 170: 709- 718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/521963
31. Marshall R.C. , Leisler B. , Catchpole C.K. , Schwabl H. ( 2005). "Male song quality affects circulating but not yolk steroid concentrations in female canaries ( Serinus canaria)". — J. Exp. Biol. Vol 208: 4593- 4598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01949
32. Mitchell D.P. , Dunn P.O. , Whittingham L.A. , Freeman-Gallant C.R. ( 2007). "Attractive males provide less parental care in two populations of the common yellowthroat". — Anim. Behav. Vol 73: 165- 170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.006
33. Moreno-Rueda G. ( 2007). "Yolk androgen deposition as a female tactic to manipulate paternal contribution". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 18: 496- 498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl106
34. Müller W. , Boonen S. , Groothuis T.G.G. , Eens M. ( 2010). "Maternal yolk testosterone in canary eggs: towards a better understanding of mechanisms and function". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 21: 493- 500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq010
35. Parker G.A. , Royle N.J. , Hartley R. ( 2002). "Intrafamilial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis". — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 357: 295- 307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0950
36. Pryke S.R. , Griffith S.C. ( 2010). "Maternal adjustment of parental effort in relation to mate compatibility affects offspring development". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 21: 226- 232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp180
37. R Development Core Team( 2009). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
38. Sanz J.J. ( 2001). "Experimentally reduced male attractiveness increases parental care in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca ". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 12: 171- 176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.2.171
39. Schwabl H. ( 1996). "Maternal testosterone in the avian egg enhances postnatal growth". — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Vol 114: 271- 276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(96)00009-6
40. Sheldon B.C. ( 2000). "Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 15: 397- 402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01953-4
41. Smiseth P.T. , Scott M.P. , Andrews C. ( 2011). "Hormonal regulation of offspring begging and mediation of parent–offspring conflict". — Anim. Behav. Vol 81: 507- 517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.029
42. Tanvez A. , Beguin N. , Chastel O. , Lacroix A. , Leboucher G. ( 2004). "Sexually attractive phrases increase yolk androgens deposition in Canaries ( Serinus canaria)". — Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. Vol 138: 113- 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.05.010
43. Vanderwerf E. ( 1992). "Lack clutch size hypothesis — an examination of the evidence using meta-analysis". — Ecology Vol 73: 1699- 1705. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940021
44. von Engelhardt N. , Groothuis T.G.G. , Bruintjes R. , Dijkstra C. ( 2004). Effects of male attractiveness on yolk androgens, offspring sex ratio and survival in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. — In: Proximate control of avian sex allocation (von Engelhardt, N., ed.). PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, p. 31-46.
45. Witte K. ( 2006). "Time spent with a male is a good indicator of mate preference in female zebra finches". — Ethol. Ecol. Evol. Vol 18: 195- 204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2006.9522707
46. Wolf J.B. , Brodie E.D. ( 1998). "The coadaptation of parental and offspring characters". — Evolution Vol 52: 299- 308. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2411068
47. Wright J. , Cuthill I. ( 1990). "Biparental care: short-term manipulation of partner contribution and brood size in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris ". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 1: 116- 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/1.2.116
48. Zuur A.F. , Ieno E.N. , Walker N.J. , Saveliev A.A. , Smith G.M. ( 2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. — Springer, New York, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003282
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003282
2015-07-08
2017-11-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation