Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Sexual segregation in human conversations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Human conversation groups have a characteristic size limit at around four individuals. Although mixed-sex social groups can be significantly larger than this, census data on casual social groups suggest that there is a fractal pattern of fission in conversations when social group size is a multiple of this value. This study suggests that, as social group size increases beyond four, there is a tendency for sexual segregation to occur resulting in an increasing frequency of single-sex conversational subgroups. It is not clear why conversations fragment in this way, but a likely explanation is that sex differences in conversational style result in women (in particular) preferring to join all-female conversations when a social group is large enough to allow this.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK

10.1163/1568539X-00003319
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003319
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003319
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Argyle M. , Lalljee M.G. , Cook M. (1968). "The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad". — Human Relat. Vol 21: 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872676802100101
2. Bowyer R.T. , Kie J.G. (2004). "Effects of foraging activity on sexual segregation in mule deer". — J. Mammal. Vol 85: 498-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/BOS-115
3. Calhim S. , Shi J. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2006). "Sexual segregation among feral goats: testing between alternative hypotheses". — Anim. Behav. Vol 72: 31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.013
4. Coates J. (1993). Women, men and language. — Longman, London.
5. Coates J. (1994). "No gap, lots of overlap: turn-taking patterns in the talk of women friends". — In: Researching language and literacy in social context ( Graddol D. , Maybin J. , Stierer B. , eds). Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, p.  177-192.
6. Coates J. (1997). "One-at-a-time: the organisation of men’s talk". — In: Language and masculinity ( Johnson S. , Meinhoff U.H. , eds). Blackwell, Oxford, p.  107-129.
7. Cohen R. (1971). "Differential cerebral processing of noise and speech stimuli". — Science Vol 172: 599-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3983.599
8. Conradt L. (1998a). "Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants?" — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 265: 1359-1363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0442
9. Dezecache G. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2012). "Sharing the joke: the size of natural laughter groups". — Evol. Human Behav. Vol 33: 775-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.07.002
10. Dunbar R.I.M. (2000). "Male mating strategies: a modelling approach". — In: Primate males ( Kappeler P. , ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.  259-268.
11. Dunbar R.I.M. (2009). "Why only humans have language". — In: The prehistory of language ( Botha R. , Knight C. , eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.  12-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545872.003.0002
12. Dunbar R.I.M. , Buckland D. , Miller D. (1990). "Mating strategies of male feral goats: a problem in optimal foraging". — Anim. Behav. Vol 40: 653-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80695-5
13. Dunbar R.I.M. , Duncan N.D.C. , Marriot A. (1997). "Human conversational behaviour". — Human Nature Vol 8: 231-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02912493
14. Dunbar R.I.M. , Duncan N.D.C. , Nettle D. (1995). "Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups". — Human Nature Vol 6: 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02734136
15. Dunbar R.I.M. , Shi J. (2008). "Sex differences in feeding activity results in sexual segregation of feral goats". — Ethology Vol 114: 444-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01478.x
16. Gervais M. , Wilson D.S. (2005). "The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: a synthetic approach". — Q. Rev. Biol. Vol 80: 395-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/498281
17. Grainger S. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2009). "The structure of dyadic conversations and sex differences in social style". — J. Evol. Psychol. Vol 7: 83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.8
18. Kessler J. (1973). "An empirical study of six- and twelve-member jury decision-making processes". — Univ. Mich. J. Law Reform Vol 6: 712-734.
19. Kinderman P. , Dunbar R.I.M. , Bentall R.P. (1998). "Theory-of-mind deficits and causal attributions". — Br. J. Psychol. Vol 89: 191-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02680.x
20. Krems J. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2013). "Clique size and network characteristics in hyperlink cinema: constraints of evolved psychology". — Human Nature Vol 24: 414-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9177-9
21. Leavitt M.J. , Mueller R.A.H. (1955). "Some effects of feedback on communication". — In: Small groups ( Hare A.P. , Borgatta E.F. , Bales R.F. , eds). Knopf, New York, NY, p.  414-433.
22. Machin A. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2013). "Impact of the biological market on selection of best friends and romantic partners". — J. Relat. Res. Vol 4: e8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2013.8
23. Main M.B. , Weckerly F.W. , Bleich V.C. (1996). "Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research". — J. Mammal. Vol 77: 449-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1382821
24. Palchykov V. , Kaski K. , Kertész J. , Barabási A.-L. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2012). "Sex differences in intimate relationships". — Sci. Rep. Vol 2: 320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00370
25. Powell J. , Lewis P. , Dunbar R.I.M. , García-Fiñana M. , Roberts N. (2010). "Orbital prefrontal cortex volume correlates with social cognitive competence". — Neuropsychologia Vol 48: 3554-3562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.004
26. Redhead G. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2013). "The functions of language: an experimental study". — Evol. Psychol. Vol 11: 845-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100409
27. Ruckstuhl K.E. , Neuhaus P. (2000). "Sexual segregation in ungulates: a new approach". — Behaviour Vol 137: 361-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853900502123
28. Ruckstuhl K.E. , Neuhaus P. (2002). "Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses". — Biol. Rev. Vol 77: 77-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005814
29. Sanders L.M. (1997). "Against deliberation". — Pol. Theory Vol 25: 347-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002
30. Stiller J. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2007). "Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size". — Social Networks Vol 29: 93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.04.001
31. Stiller J. , Nettle D. , Dunbar R.I.M. (2004). "The small world of Shakespeare’s plays". — Human Nature Vol 14: 397-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1013-1
32. Tomasello M. (2008). Origins of human communication. — MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Waller B.M. , Hope L. , Burrowes N. , Morrison E.R. (2011). "Twelve (not so) angry men: managing conversational group size increases perceived contribution by decision makers". — Group Proc. Intergroup Relat. Vol 14: 835-843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430211407099
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003319
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003319
2016-01-01
2017-11-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation