Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Stepping off the pasture: evidence of widespread alternative male mating tactics in the yellow dung fly

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Geoff Parker’s investigations of the yellow dung fly mating system revitalized interest in sexual selection theory, sparked development of sperm competition and sexual conflict theories, and stimulated use of this species as an important model system. Numerous studies across widespread populations have demonstrated large-male advantages in competition contests occurring on dung in cow pastures; however, recent work suggests that smaller males adopt an alternative mating tactic by avoiding dung and instead copulating with females at foraging sites. Though this finding has the potential to expand our understanding of sexual selection in yellow dung flies, such behavior has to date been documented at only one field site, raising the possibility that this phenomenon is highly localized. Here, we report the expression of size-dependent alternative mating tactics across three discrete populations. These findings provide a cautionary tale for researchers limiting their attention to aggregation sites where study organisms are most conveniently encountered.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA

10.1163/1568539X-00003331
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003331
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003331
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Amano K. (1983). "Studies on the intraspecific competition in dung-breeding flies. I. Effects of larval density on yellow dung fly, Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae)". — Jpn. J. Sanit Zool. Vol 34: 165-175.
2. Bennington C.C. , McGraw J.B. (1995). "Phenotypic selection in an artificial population of Impatiens pallida: the importance of the invisible fraction". — Evolution Vol 49: 317-324. [Crossref]
3. Birkhead T.R. , Monaghan P. (2010). "Ingenious ideas: the history of behavioral ecology". — In: Evolutionary behavioral ecology ( Westneat D.F. , Fox C.W. , eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.  3-15.
4. Birkhead T.R. , Montgomerie R. (2009). "Three centuries of sperm research". — In: Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective ( Birkhead T.R. , Hosken D.J. , Pitnick S. , eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p.  1-42. [Crossref]
5. Blanckenhorn W.U. (1997). "Effects of temperature on growth, development and diapause in the yellow dung fly — against all the rules?" — Oecologia Vol 111: 318-324. [Crossref]
6. Blanckenhorn W.U. (1998). "Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in growth, development, and body size in the yellow dung fly". — Evolution Vol 52: 1394-1407. [Crossref]
7. Blanckenhorn W.U. , Frei J. , Birrer M. (2003). "The effect of female arrivals on mate monopolization in the yellow dung fly". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 54: 65-70. [Crossref]
8. Blanckenhorn W.U. , Pemberton A.J. , Bussière L.F. , Roembke J. , Floate K.D. (2010). "A review of the natural history and laboratory culture methods for the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria ". — J. Insect Sci. Vol 10: 1-17. [Crossref]
9. Borgia G. (1980). "Sexual competition in Scatophaga stercoraria: size- and density-related changes in male ability to capture females". — Behaviour Vol 75: 185-206. [Crossref]
10. Borgia G. (1981). "Mate selection in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria: female choice in a male-controlled system". — Anim. Behav. Vol 29: 71-80. [Crossref]
11. Bussière L.F. , Demont M. , Pemberton A.J. , Hall M.D. , Ward P.I. (2010). "The assessment of insemination success in yellow dung flies using competitive PCR". — Mol. Ecol. Vol 10: 292-303. [Crossref]
12. Carroll S.P. (1993). "Divergence in male mating tactics between two populations of the soapberry bug: I. Guarding versus nonguarding". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 4: 156-164. [Crossref]
13. Carroll S.P. , Corneli P.S. (1995). "Divergence in male mating tactics between two populations of the soapberry bug: II. Genetic change and the evolution of a plastic reaction norm in a variable social environment". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 6: 46-56. [Crossref]
14. Charnov E.L. (1976). "Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem". — Theor. Popul. Biol. Vol 9: 129-136. [Crossref]
15. Demont M. , Blanckenhorn W.U. , Hosken D.J. , Garner T.W.J. (2008). "Molecular and quantitative genetic differentiation across Europe in yellow dung flies". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 21: 1492-1503. [Crossref]
16. Ding A. , Blanckenhorn W.U. (2002). "The effect of sexual size dimorphism on mating behaviour in two dung flies with contrasting dimorphism". — Evol. Ecol. Res. Vol 4: 259-273.
17. Fretwell S.D. (1972). Populations in a seasonal environment. — Princeton University Press, Princeton.
18. Fretwell S.D. , Lucas H.L. Jr. (1970). "On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development". — Acta Biotheor. Vol 19: 16-36. [Crossref]
19. Godin J.-G.J. (1995). "Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata)". — Oecologia Vol 103: 224-229. [Crossref]
20. Gress B.E. , Waltzer R.J. , Lüpold S. , Droge-Young E.M. , Manier M.K. , Pitnick S. (2014). "Alternative mating tactics in the yellow dung fly: resolving mechanisms of small-male advantage off pasture". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 281: 20132164.
21. Gross M.R. (1996). "Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 11: 92-98. [Crossref]
22. Hadfield J.D. (2008). "Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 275: 723-734. [Crossref]
23. Hosken D.J. , Blanckenhorn W.U. , Garner T.W.J. (2002). "Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria)". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 269: 1701-1707. [Crossref]
24. Jann P. , Blanckenhorn W.U. , Ward P.I. (2000). "Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria ". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 13: 927-938. [Crossref]
25. Kolluru G.R. , Grether G.F. (2005). "The effects of resource availability on alternative mating tactics in guppies (Pecilia reticulata)". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 16: 294-300. [Crossref]
26. Lively C.M. (1986). "Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially variable environment". — Am. Nat. Vol 218: 561-572. [Crossref]
27. Oliveira R. , Schlindwein C. (2010). "Experimental demonstration of alternative mating tactics of male Ptilothrix fructifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae)". — Anim. Behav. Vol 80: 241-247. [Crossref]
28. Otronen M. (1995). "Energy reserves and mating success in males of the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria ". — Funct. Ecol. Vol 9: 683-688. [Crossref]
29. Otronen M. , Reguera P. , Ward P.I. (1997). "Sperm storage in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria: identifying the sperm of competing males in separate female spermathecae". — Ethology Vol 103: 844-854. [Crossref]
30. Parker G.A. (1970a). "Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects". — Biol. Rev. Vol 45: 525-567. [Crossref]
31. Parker G.A. (1970b). "Sperm competition and its evolutionary effect on copula duration in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria ". — J. Insect Physiol. Vol 16: 1301-1328. [Crossref]
32. Parker G.A. (1970c). "The reproductive behavior and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). VII. The origin and evolution of the passive phase". — Evolution Vol 24: 774-788. [Crossref]
33. Parker G.A. (1970d). "The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae): I. Diurnal and seasonal changes in population density around the site of mating and oviposition". — J. Anim. Ecol. Vol 39: 185-204. [Crossref]
34. Parker G.A. (1970e). "The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae): II. The fertilization rate and the spatial and temporal relationships of each sex around the site of mating and oviposition". — J. Anim. Ecol. Vol 39: 205-228. [Crossref]
35. Parker G.A. (1970f). "The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). V. The female’s behaviour at the oviposition site". — Behaviour Vol 37: 140-168. [Crossref]
36. Parker G.A. (1971). "The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). VI. The adaptive significance of emigration from the oviposition site during the phase of genital contact". — J. Anim. Ecol. Vol 40: 215-233. [Crossref]
37. Parker G.A. (1979). "Sexual selection and sexual conflict". — In: Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects ( Blum M.S. , Blum N.A. , eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p.  123-166.
38. Parker G.A. (1990). "Sperm competition games: raffles and roles". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 242: 120-126. [Crossref]
39. Parker G.A. (1992). "Marginal value theorem with exploitation time costs: diet, sperm reserves, and optimal copula duration in dung flies". — Am. Nat. Vol 139: 1237-1256. [Crossref]
40. Parker G.A. (2001). "Golden flies, sunlit meadows: a tribute to the yellow dungfly". — In: Model systems in behavioral ecology: integrating conceptual, theoretical, and empirical approaches ( Dugatkin L.A. , ed.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p.  3-26.
41. Parker G.A. (2006). "Behavioural ecology: natural history as science". — In: Essays in Animal Behaviour: celebrating 50 years of Animal Behaviour ( Lucas J.R. , Simmons L.W. , eds). Elsevier, London, p.  23-56.
42. Parker G.A. , Stuart R.A. (1976). "Animal behavior as a strategy optimizer: evolution of resource assessment strategies and optimal emigration thresholds". — Am. Nat. Vol 110: 1055-1076. [Crossref]
43. Parker G.A. , Simmons L.W. , Ward P.I. (1993). "Optimal copula duration in dungflies: effects of frequency dependence and female mating status". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 32: 157-166. [Crossref]
44. Piché J. , Hutchings J.A. , Blanchard W. (2008). "Genetic variation in threshold reaction norm for alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar ". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 275: 1571-1575. [Crossref]
45. Pitnick S. , Henn K.R.H. , Maheux S.D. , Higginson D.M. , Hurtado-Gonzales J.L. , Manier M.K. , Berben K.S. , Guptill C. , Uy J.A.C. (2009). "Size-dependent alternative male mating tactics in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria ". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 276: 3229-3237. [Crossref]
46. R Development Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
47. Shalini R. , Gupta D.K. (2010). "Utilization of pomace from apple processing industries: a review". — J. Food Sci. Technol. Vol 47: 365-371. [Crossref]
48. Sigurjónsdóttir H. , Parker G.A. (1981). "Dung fly struggles: evidence for assessment strategy". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 8: 219-230. [Crossref]
49. Sigurjónsdóttir H. , Snorrason S.S. (1995). "Distribution of male yellow dungflies around ovipasition sites: the effect of body size". — Ecol. Entomol. Vol 20: 84-90. [Crossref]
50. Simmons L.W. , Ward P.I. (1991). "The heritability of sexually dimorphic traits in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.)". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 4: 593-601. [Crossref]
51. Sinervo B. , McAdam A.G. (2008). "Maturational costs of reproduction due to clutch size and ontogenetic conflict as revealed in the invisible fraction". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 275: 629-638. [Crossref]
52. Smith J.M. , Parker G.A. (1976). "The logic of asymmetric contests". — Anim. Behav. Vol 24: 159-175. [Crossref]
53. Tomkins J.L. , Brown G.S. (2004). "Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism". — Nature Vol 431: 1099-1103. [Crossref]
54. USDA (2014). 2014 Washington annual statistical bulletin. — United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
55. Sigurjónsdóttir H. , Snorrason S.S. (1995). "Distribution of male yellow dungflies around ovipasition sites: the effect of body size". — Ecol. Entomol. Vol 20: 84-90. [Crossref]
56. Pitnick S. , Henn K.R.H. , Maheux S.D. , Higginson D.M. , Hurtado-Gonzales J.L. , Manier M.K. , Berben K.S. , Guptill C. , Uy J.A.C. (2009). "Size-dependent alternative male mating tactics in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria ". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 276: 3229-3237. [Crossref]
57. SAS Institute (2014). SAS software. — SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003331
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003331
2016-02-01
2017-11-25

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation