Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The wolf spider Pardosa milvina detects predator threat level using only vibratory cues

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Predators may inadvertently signal their presence and threat level by way of signals in multiple modalities. We used a spider, Pardosa milvina, known to respond adaptively to chemotactile predator cues (i.e., silk, faeces and other excreta) to evaluate whether it could also discriminate predation risk from isolated vibratory cues. Vibrations from its prey, conspecifics, and predators (Tigrosa helluo and Scarites quadriceps) were recorded and played back to Pardosa. In addition, we recorded predator vibrations with and without access to chemotactile cues from Pardosa, indicating the presence of prey. Pardosa did not appear to discriminate between vibrations from prey or conspecifics, but the response to predators depended on the presence of cues from Pardosa. Vibrations from predators with access to chemotactile cues from prey induced reductions in Pardosa activity. Predator cues typically occur in multiple modalities, but prey are capable of imperfectly evaluating predation risk using a limited subset of information.

Affiliations: 1: aDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA; 2: bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 3: cDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Hamilton, OH, USA

Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare

Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Abdi H. , Williams L.J. (2010). "Principal component analysis". — Comp. Stat. Vol 2: 433-459.
2. Barnes M.C. , Persons M.H. , Rypstra A.L. (2002). "The effect of predator chemical cue age on antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae)". — J. Insect Behav. Vol 15: 269-281.
3. Barth F.G. (2002). A spider’s world: senses and behavior. — Springer, Berlin.
4. Bell R.D. , Rypstra A.L. , Persons M.H. (2006). "The effect of predator hunger on chemically mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae)". — Ethology Vol 112: 903-910.
5. Brownell P.H. (1977). "Compressional and surface waves in sand: used by desert scorpions to locate prey". — Science Vol 197: 479-482.
6. Caldwell M.S. , McDaniel J.G. , Warkentin K.M. (2010). "Is it safe? Red-eyed treefrog embryos assessing predation risk use two features of rain vibrations to avoid false alarms". — Anim. Behav. Vol 79: 255-260.
7. Castellanos I. , Barbosa P. (2006). "Evaluation of predation risk by a caterpillar using substrate-borne vibrations". — Anim. Behav. Vol 72: 461-469.
8. Crawford B.A. , Hickman C.R. , Luhring T.M. (2012). "Testing the threat-sensitive hypothesis with predator familiarity and dietary specificity". — Ethology Vol 118: 41-48.
9. Foelix R.F. (1996). Biology of spiders. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
10. Folz H.C. , Wilder S.M. , Persons M.H. , Rypstra A.L. (2006). "Effects of predation risk on vertical habitat use and foraging of Pardosa milvina ". — Ethology Vol 112: 1152-1158.
11. Girard M.B. , Kasumovic M.M. , Elias D.O. (2011). "Multi-modal courtship in the peacock spider, Maratus volans (O.P.-Cambridge, 1874)". — PLoS ONE Vol 6: e25390.
12. Gordon S.D. , Uetz G.W. (2011). "Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity". — Anim. Behav. Vol 81: 367-375.
13. Hebets E.A. , Papaj D.R. (2005). "Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 57: 197-214.
14. Helfman G.S. (1989). "Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish–trumpetfish interactions". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 24: 47-58.
15. Hettena A.M. , Munoz N. , Blumstein D.T. (2014). "Prey responses to a predator’s sounds: a review and empirical study". — Ethology Vol 120: 1-26.
16. Hill P.S.M. (2009). "How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source?" — Naturwissenschaften Vol 96: 1355-1371.
17. Hoefler C.D. , Taylor M. , Jakob E.M. (2002). "Chemosensory response to prey in Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae) and Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae)". — J. Arachnol. Vol 30: 155-158.[0155:CRTPIP]2.0.CO;2
18. Kats L.B. , Dill L.M. (1998). "The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals". — Ecoscience Vol 5: 361-394.
19. Lehmann L.M. , Walker S.E. , Persons M.H. (2004). "The influence of predator sex on chemically mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae)". — Ethology Vol 110: 323-339.
20. Lima S.L. , Dill L.M. (1990). "Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 68: 619-640.
21. Lizotte R.S. , Rovner J.S. (1988). "Nocturnal capture of fireflies by lycosids spiders: visual versus vibratory stimuli". — Anim. Behav. Vol 36: 1809-1815.
22. Lohrey A.K. , Clark D.L. , Gordon S.L. , Uetz G.W. (2009). "Antipredator responses of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) to sensory cues representing an avian predator". — Anim. Behav. Vol 77: 813-821.
23. Marshall S.D. , Rypstra A.L. (1999). "Patterns in the distribution of two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in two soybean agroecosystems". — Environ. Entomol. Vol 38: 1052-1059.
24. McGregor P.K. (2000). "Playback experiments: design and analysis". — Acta Ethol. Vol 3: 3-8.
25. McNabb D.M. , Halaj J. , Wise D.H. (2001). "Inferring trophic positions of generalist predators and their linkage to the detrital food web in agroecosystems: a stable isotope analysis". — Pedobiologia Vol 45: 289-297.
26. Partan S.R. , Marler P. (2005). "Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals". — Am. Nat. Vol 2: 231-245.
27. Persons M.H. , Rypstra A.L. (2000). "Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae)". — Ethology Vol 106: 27-35.
28. Persons M.H. , Rypstra A.L. (2001). "Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators". — J. Chem. Ecol. Vol 27: 2493-2504.
29. Persons M.H. , Uetz G.W. (1998). "Presampling sensory information and prey density assessment by wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae)". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 9: 360-366.
30. Persons M.H. , Walker S.E. , Rypstra A.L. (2002). "Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae)". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 13: 386-392.
31. Persons M.H. , Walker S.E. , Rypstra A.L. , Marshall S.D. (2001). "Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae)". — Anim. Behav. Vol 61: 43-51.
32. Pruitt J.N. , Stachowicz J.J. , Sih A. (2012). "Behavioral types of predator and prey jointly determine prey survival: potential implications for the maintenance of within-species behavioral variation". — Am. Nat. Vol 179: 217-227.
33. Rypstra A.L. , Schmidt J.M. , Reif B.D. , DeVito J. , Persons M.H. (2007). "Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in a wolf spider: effects of substrate structure and predation risk". — Oikos Vol 116: 853-863.
34. Rypstra A.L. , Schlosser A.M. , Sutton P.L. , Persons M.H. (2009). "Multimodal signalling: the relative importance of chemical and visual cues from females to the behaviour of male wolf spiders". — Anim. Behav. Vol 77: 937-947.
35. Schonewolf K.W. , Bell R. , Rypstra A.L. , Persons M.H. (2006). "Field evidence of an airborne enemy-avoidance kairomone in wolf spiders". — J. Chem. Ecol. Vol 32: 1565-1576.
36. Sih A. (2013). "Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview". — Anim. Behav. Vol 85: 1077-1088.
37. Sitvarin M.I. , Rypstra A.L. (2012). "Sex-specific response of Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae) to experience with a chemotactile predation cue". — Ethology Vol 118: 1230-1239.
38. Sitvarin M.I. , Rypstra A.L. (2014). "The importance of intraguild in predicting emergent multiple predator effects". — Ecology Vol 95: 2936-2945.
39. Taylor A.R. , Persons M.H. , Rypstra A.L. (2005). "The effect of perceived predation risk on male courtship and copulatory behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae)". — J. Arachnol. Vol 33: 76-81.
40. Uetz G.W. , Roberts J.A. (2002). "Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies". — Brain Behav. Evol. Vol 59: 222-230.
41. Uetz G.W. , Roberts J.A. , Taylor P.W. (2009). "Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals". — Anim. Behav. Vol 78: 299-305.
42. Uetz G.W. , Roberts J.A. , Clark D.L. , Gibson J.S. , Gordon S.D. (2013). "Multimodal signals increase active space of communication by wolf spiders in a complex litter environment". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 67: 1471-1482.
43. Virant-Doberlet M. , King R.A. , Polajnar J. , Symondson W.O.C. (2011). "Molecular diagnostics reveal spiders that exploit prey vibrational signals used in sexual communication". — Mol. Ecol. Vol 20: 2204-2216.
44. Warkentin K.M. (2005). "How do embryos assess risk? Vibrational cues in predator-induced hatching of red-eyed treefrogs". — Anim. Behav. Vol 70: 59-71.
45. Wu C.-H. , Elias D.O. (2014). "Vibratory noise in anthropogenic habitats and its effect on prey detection in a web-building spider". — Anim. Behav. Vol 90: 47-56.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation