Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Alarm cue specificity and response ontogeny in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Many aquatic prey animals release chemical cues upon being captured by a predator. These chemical cues, referred to as alarm cues, may act to warn nearby individuals of danger. For the cues to be useful, fish must be able to discern if they are indicative of a real threat; cues from conspecifics in different age groups may be irrelevant due to size- and habitat-related shifts in predation risk. We test the response of newly-hatched rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, to three concentrations of alarm cues from conspecifics from two age groups: newly-hatched versus six-month-old juveniles. Newly-hatched trout demonstrated a significant fright response to all three concentrations of alarm cues, but showed no difference in strength of response based on either concentration or age of the cue donor. We propose that the newly-hatched trout did not respond differently because of the high risk of predation that they face during this life stage.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7J 2X3

*Corresponding author’s e-mail address: marianna.horn@usask.ca
10.1163/1568539X-00003426
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003426
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003426
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Behnke R.J. (2002). "Rainbow trout". — In: Trout and salmon of North America ( Scott G., ed.). The Free Press, New York, NY, p.  67-123.
2. Brown G.E., Smith R.J.F. (1997). "Conspecific skin extracts elicit antipredator responses in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 75: 1916-1922. [Crossref]
3. Brown G.E., LeBlanc V.J., Porter L.E. (2001). "Ontogenetic changes in the response of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides, Centrarchidae, Perciformes) to heterospecific alarm pheromones". — Ethology Vol 107: 401-414. [Crossref]
4. Brown G.E., Bongiorno T., DiCapua D.M., Ivan L.I., Roh E. (2006). "Effects of group size on the threat-sensitive response to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cues by juvenile convict cichlids". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 84: 1-8. [Crossref]
5. Carreau-Green N.D., Mirza R.S., Martinez M.L., Pyle G.G. (2008). "The ontogeny of chemically mediated antipredator responses of fathead minnows Pimephales promelas". — J. Fish. Biol. Vol 73: 2390-2401. [Crossref]
6. Chivers D.P., Smith R.J.F. (1998). "Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus". — Ecoscience Vol 5: 338-352. [Crossref]
7. Ferrari M.C.O., Messier F., Chivers D.P. (2008). "Can prey exhibit threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition? Extending the predator recognition continuum hypothesis". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 275: 1811-1816. [Crossref]
8. Golub J.L., Brown G.E. (2003). "Are all signals the same? Ontogenetic change in the response to conspecific and heterospecific chemical alarm signals by juvenile green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus)". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 54: 113-118.
9. Helfman G.S. (1989). "Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interactions". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 24: 47-58. [Crossref]
10. Helfman G.S., Winkelman D.L. (1997). "Threat sensitivity in bicolor damselfish: effects of sociality and body size". — Ethology Vol 103: 369-383. [Crossref]
11. Lawrence B.J., Smith R.J.F. (1989). "Behavioural response of solitary fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, to alarm substance". — J. Chem. Ecol. Vol 15: 209-219. [Crossref]
12. Lima S.L., Dill L.M. (1990). "Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 68: 619-640. [Crossref]
13. Lönnstedt O.M., McCormick M.I. (2011). "Chemical alarm cues inform prey of predation threat: the importance of ontogeny and concentration in a coral reef fish". — Anim. Behav. Vol 82: 213-218. [Crossref]
14. Marcus J., Brown G.E. (2003). "Response of pumpkinseed sunfish to conspecific chemical alarm cues: an interaction between ontogeny and stimulus concentration". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 81: 1671-1677. [Crossref]
15. Mirza R.S., Chivers D.P. (2002). "Brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis) can differentiate chemical alarm cues produced by different age/size classes of conspecifics". — J. Chem. Ecol. Vol 28: 555-564. [Crossref]
16. Mirza R.S., Chivers D.P. (2003). "Response of juvenile rainbow trout to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cue: response thresholds and survival during encounters with predators". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 81: 88-95. [Crossref]
17. Mitchell M.D., McCormick M.I. (2013). "Ontogenetic differences in chemical alarm cue production determine antipredator responses and learned predator recognition". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 67: 1123-1129. [Crossref]
18. Paine R.T. (1976). "Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction". — Ecology Vol 57: 858-873. [Crossref]
19. Persson L., Andersson J., Wahlström E., Eklöv P. (1996). "Size-specific interactions in lake systems: predator gape limitation and prey growth rate and mortality". — Ecology Vol 77: 900-911. [Crossref]
20. Pfeiffer W. (1963). "The fright reaction in North American fish". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 41: 69-77. [Crossref]
21. Pfeiffer W. (1977). "The distribution of fright reaction and alarm substance cells in fishes". — Copeia: 653-665. [Crossref]
22. Popova O.A. (1978). "The role of predaceous fish in ecosystems". — In: Ecology of freshwater fish production ( Gerking S.D., ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, p.  215-249.
23. Waldman B. (1982). "Quantitative and developmental analyses of the alarm reaction in the zebra danio, Brachydanio rerio". — Copeia: 1-9. [Crossref]
24. Werner E.E., Gilliam J.F. (1984). "The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations". — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Vol 15: 393-425. [Crossref]
25. Wisenden B.D. (2015). "Chemical cues that indicate risk of predation". — In: Fish pheromones and related cues ( Sorensen P.W., Wisenden B.D., eds). Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, p.  131-148.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003426
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539x-00003426
2017-03-20
2017-11-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation