Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Contrasting seasonal reactions of two sibling woodpeckers to playback stimulation in urban areas — implications for inventory and monitoring of the Syrian woodpecker

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

The Syrian woodpecker (Dendrocopos syriacus) is the most synanthropic species among European woodpeckers and can be considered to be a synurbic species benefiting from human activity and man-made habitats. Because it is closely related to the common great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major), the interactions between the species should be investigated before conducting any study on the Syrian woodpecker. The aim of this study was to assess, analyse and compare both species reactions to the broadcasting of Syrian woodpecker playbacks throughout the year, in urban areas. The study was conducted in three Polish towns. All sites hosted populations of Syrian and great spotted woodpeckers living sympatrically. Both woodpeckers were observed throughout each year of study and responded to playback. The Syrian woodpecker more willingly responded to playbacks. Especially interesting was that the Syrian woodpecker female participated in territorial activity to a greater degree than males (sex-role reversed species). This is the first woodpecker study that shows a stronger territorial activity in females than males and the first reporting woodpecker reactions to playback stimulation throughout the year. The Syrian woodpecker is a rare and threatened species in Europe (protected under the Birds Directive of the European Union (2009/147/EC) and is considered a keystone species for woods and associated biodiversity in urban areas. Therefore, application of efficient methods for precise recognition of Syrian woodpecker territories (not only breeding ones) on the basis of correct interpretation of its behaviour is crucial for its conservation and urban habitat management.

Affiliations: 1: Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 17 Sławkowska, 31-016 Krakow, Poland

*Author’s e-mail address:

Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Amundsen T. (2000). "Why are female birds ornamented?" — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 15: 149-155. [Crossref]
2. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. (1998). Principles of animal communication. — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
3. Bütler R., Angelstam P., Ekelund P., Schlaepfer R. (2004). "Dead wood threshold values for the Three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-Alpine forest". — Biol. Conserv. Vol 119: 305-318. [Crossref]
4. Catchpole C.K., Slater P.J.B. (2008). Bird song. biological themes and variations. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Crossref]
5. Ciach M., Fröhlich A. (2013). "Habitat preferences of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in urban environments: an ambiguous effect of pollution". — Bird Study Vol 60: 491-499. [Crossref]
6. Cramp S. (1985). The birds of the Western Palearctic. 6. Terns to woodpeckers. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Czeszczewik D., Walankiewicz W. (2006). "Logging affects the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos distribution in the Białowieża forest". — Ann. Zool. Fenn. Vol 43: 221-227.
8. Dudzik K., Polakowski M. (2011). "Przypadki lęgów mieszanych oraz problematyka identyfikacji mieszańców międzygatunkowych dzięcioła białoszyjego Dendrocopos syriacus i dzięcioła dużego Dendrocopos major w Polsce. [The cases of mixed broods and identification of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus and Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major hybrids in Poland]". — Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. Vol 67: 254-260. (In Polish with English summary).
9. Figarski T. (2014). "Habitat characteristics of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in the city of Radom, Poland — preliminary results". — In: Urban fauna. animal, man, and the city — interactions and relationships ( Indykiewicz P., Böhner J., eds). University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, p.  225-234.
10. Figarski T., Kajtoch L. (2018). Hybrids and mixed pairs of Syrian and great-spotted woodpeckers in urban populations. — J. Ornithol., in press.
11. Francis R.A., Chadwick M.A. (2012). "What makes a species synurbic?" — Appl. Geogr. Vol 32: 514-521. [Crossref]
12. Fröhlich A., Ciach M. (2013). "Rozmieszczenie i liczebność dzięcioła białoszyjego Dendrocopos syriacus w Krakowie. [Distribution and abundance of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in Kraków]". — Ornis Polonica Vol 54: 237-246. (In Polish with English abstract).
13. Gil D., Brumm H. (eds) (2014). Avian urban ecology. Behavioural and physiological adaptations. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Glutz von Blotzheim U.N., Bauer K. (1980). Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol Vol. IX. — Akademische Verlag, Wiesbaden. (In German).
15. Gorman G. (2004). Woodpeckers of Europe: a study of the European Picidae. — Bruce Coleman, Chalfont St Peter.
16. Hall M.L. (2000). "The function of duetting in magpie-larks: conflict, cooperation or commitment?" — Anim. Behav. Vol 60: 667-677. [Crossref]
17. Hall M.L., Rittenbach M.R.D., Vehrencamp S.L. (2015). "Female song and vocal interactions with males in a Neotropical wren". — Front. Ecol. Evol. Vol 3: 12. DOI:10.3389/fevo.2015.00012.
18. Illes A.E., Yunes-Jimenez L. (2009). "A female songbird out-sings male conspecifics during simulated territorial intrusions". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. Vol 276: 981-986. [Crossref]
19. Kajtoch Ł. (2017). "The importance of traditional orchards for breeding birds: The preliminary study on Central European example". — Acta Oecol. Vol 78: 53-60. DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2016.12.010. [Crossref]
20. Kajtoch Ł., Figarski T. (2017). "Comparative distribution of Syrian and great spotted woodpeckers in different landscapes of Poland". — Folia Zool. Vol 66: 29-36.
21. Kajtoch Ł., Figarski T., Pełka J. (2013). "The role of structural elements of forests in determining the occurrence of two specialist woodpecker species in the Carpathians, Poland". — Ornis Fenn. Vol 90: 23-40.
22. Kosiński Z., Winiecki A. (2005). "Factors affecting the density of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius: a macrohabitat approach". — J. Ornithol. Vol 146: 263-270. [Crossref]
23. Kurek H. (1984). "Dzięcioł syryjski (Dendrocopos syriacus) w dolinie Sanu. [Syrian woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in the San River Valley]". — Not. Ornitol. Vol 25: 65-68. (In Polish with English abstract).
24. Luniak M. (2004). "Synurbization — adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development". — In: Proceedings of the 4th International Wildlife Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation ( Shaw W.W., Harris K.L., van Druff L., eds). University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, p. 50-55.
25. Marler P., Slabbekoorn H. (2004). Nature’s music: the science of birdsong. — Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
26. Michalczuk J. (2014). "Expansion of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in Europe and Western Asia". — Ornis Polonica Vol 55: 149-161.
27. Michalczuk J., Michalczuk M. (2006a). "Reaction to playback and density estimations of Syrian Woodpeckers Dendrocopos syriacus in agricultural areas of south-eastern Poland". — Acta Ornithol. Vol 41: 33-39. [Crossref]
28. Michalczuk J., Michalczuk M. (2006b). "Przydatność metody kartograficznej z użyciem stymulacji głosowej do oceny liczebności dzięcioła białoszyjego Dendrocopos syriacus. [The usefulness of the mapping method with playback in estimation of the numbers of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus]". — Not. Ornitol. Vol 47: 175-184. (In Polish with English abstract).
29. Michalczuk J., Michalczuk M. (2011). "Dzięcioł białoszyi Dendrocopos syriacus w Zlewni Górnej Huczwy w latach 2004–2006. [Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in the Upper Huczwa River watershed in 2004–2006]". — Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. Vol 67: 426-432. (In Polish with English summary).
30. Michalczuk J., Michalczuk M. (2016a). "Habitat preferences of Picidae woodpeckers in the agricultural landscape of SE Poland: is the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus colonizing a vacant ecological niche?" — North-west. J. Zool. Vol 12: 14-21.
31. Michalczuk J., Michalczuk M. (2016b). "Coexistence of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus and Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in nonforest tree stands of the agricultural landscape in SE Poland". — Turk. J. Zool. Vol 40: 743-748. [Crossref]
32. Michalczuk J., Michalczuk M., Cymbała R. (2011). "Przydatność różnych metod do monitoringu liczebności dzięcioła białoszyjego Dendrocopos syriacus. [The usefulness of various methods of monitoring the population size of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus]". — Ornis Polonica Vol 52: 280-287. (In Polish with English abstract).
33. Michalczuk J., McDevitt A.D., Mazgajski T.D., Figarski T., Ilieva M., Bujoczek M., Malczyk P., Kajtoch Ł. (2014). "Tests of multiple molecular markers for the identification of Great Spotted and Syrian Woodpeckers and their hybrids". — J. Ornithol. Vol 155: 591-600. [Crossref]
34. Mikusiński G. (2006). "Woodpeckers: distribution, conservation, and research in a global perspective". — Ann. Zool. Fenn. Vol 43: 86-95.
35. Mikusiński G., Angelstam P. (1998). "Economic geography, forest distribution and woodpecker diversity in central Europe". — Conserv. Biol. Vol 12: 200-208. [Crossref]
36. Mikusiński G., Gromadzki M., Chylarecki P. (2001). "Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity". — Conserv. Biol. Vol 15: 208-217. [Crossref]
37. Mošanský L., Mošanský A. (1999). "Development of Syrian Woodpecker (Dendrocopos syriacus) and Great Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) population in Košice urban area". — Tichodroma Vol 12(Suppl. 1): 97-106.
38. Pakkala T., Hanski I., Tomppo T. (2002). "Spatial ecology of the three-toed woodpecker in manager forest landscapes". — Silva Fenn. Vol 36: 279-288. [Crossref]
39. Pasinelli G. (2006). "Population biology of European woodpecker species: a review". — Ann. Zool. Fenn. Vol 43: 96-111.
40. Virkkala R. (2006). "Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems". — Ann. Zool. Fenn. Vol 43: 82-85.
41. Winkler H. (1972). "Beiträge zur Ethologie des Blutspechts (Dendrocopos syriacus). Das nicht-reproduktive Verhalten". — Z. Tierpsychol. Vol 31: 300-325. (In German). [Crossref]
42. Winkler H., Christie D.A., Nurney D. (1995). Woodpeckers. A guide to the woodpeckers, piculets and wrynecks of the World. — Pica Press, Mountfield.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation