Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Do studies of functional groups give more insight to amphipod biodiversity?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Amphipod crustaceans are able to colonise different micro-habitats of coastal marine benthos due to a multiplicity of trophic and morpho-functional adaptations, and may be considered a key taxon in describing the structure of assemblages. Literature concerning amphipod feeding behaviour and way of life showed that studies on functional groups (FGs) started only in the 1980s. A short review about the state of the art of the knowledge is presented here. Aiming at investigating the functional role of amphipods and to ascertain to what extent their adaptations could be a response to different biotic and abiotic conditions, some examples of studies conducted in the Mediterranean Sea on various plant substrata (Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera marina, Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea), at different spatial and temporal scales, were given. Despite many doubts about some species, due to the lack of information and their opportunistic behaviour, the identified taxa were grouped in the main categories of suspension feeders, deposit feeders, carnivores, commensals, herbivores, plant detritus feeders, omnivores, and in the mixed categories of deposit-suspension feeders, deposit feeders-carnivores, herbivores-deposit feeders, according to the food ingested and their feeding strategies; and, according to their life-habits, in epifaunal free-living and domicolous, and infaunal free-burrowing and tube-building. FGs might be considered good descriptors of zonation patterns, mainly against gradients such as depth, where strong environmental factors play a role. FG composition was differentiated according to the structural complexity and the stability of the host plant. Changes observed on a long-term scale, due to regression phenomena in P. oceanica meadows or to the spread of the invasive species C. racemosa var. cylindracea, were well described by FGs. In the first case the trophic diversity was maintained and in the latter the lack of herbivorous forms pointed out the poor role as structuring plant of the seaweed. Although caution is suggested in studies on FGs, they can give further insight in comprehending structural and functional processes in amphipod ecology.

Affiliations: 1: Functional and Evolutionary Ecology Laboratory, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn di Napoli, Villa Dohrn, I-80077 Ischia Porto (Naples), Italy

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685403-00003209
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685403-00003209
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685403-00003209
2013-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Crustaceana — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation