Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

What drives non-native amphipod distributions in the River Thames? The role of habitat and human activity on species abundance

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Crustaceana

Increasing colonization of non-native amphipod species in the River Thames, United Kingdom, has altered aquatic ecology and called existing management practices into question. We studied the distribution patterns of recent non-native (Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichwald, 1841)), established non-native (Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Bousfield, 1958)), and native amphipod (Gammarus pulex (Linnaeus, 1758)) species, as well as habitat and human influences across 84 sites in the upper Thames catchment. Our findings showed widespread distribution and density of G. pulex relative to D. haemobaphes, suggesting that the full impact of the current spread has yet to be felt since its 2012 introduction. Different habitat utilization patterns are explained through habitat partitioning: both D. haemobaphes and C. pseudogracilis occupied vegetative habitats, not pebble/gravel habitats where the native G. pulex was most often found. The association between D. haemobaphes and boating presence implies that effective biosecurity would be best focused on boat traffic in the Thames and Cherwell rivers.

Affiliations: 1: 1Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, U.K. ; 2: 2Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, 1 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JA, U.K. ; 3: 3Environment Agency, Red Kite House, Howbery Park, Wallingford OX10 8BD, U.K.

4Corresponding author; e-mail: clarke.knight@berkeley.edu
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685403-00003665
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Aldridge D. C., 2013. Great Britain non-native organism rapid risk assessment for Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichwald, 1841). Available online at http://www.nonnativespecies.org.
2. Aldridge D. C., Elliott P., Moggridge G. D., 2004. "The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain". Biol. Conserv., Vol 119: 253-261. [Crossref]
3. Anderson L. G., Dunn A. M., Rosewarne P. J., Stebbing P. D., 2015. "Invaders in hot water: a simple decontamination method to prevent the accidental spread of aquatic invasive non-native species". Biol. Invasions, Vol 17: 2287-2297. [Crossref]
4. Ashelby C. W., De Grave S., Johnson M. L., 2016. "Diet analysis indicates seasonal fluctuation in trophic overlap and separation between a native and an introduced shrimp species (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) in the tidal River Thames (U.K.)". Crustaceana, Vol 89: 701-719. [Crossref]
5. Bacela-Spychalska K., 2016. "Attachment ability of two invasive amphipod species may promote their spread by overland transport". Aquat. Conserv., Vol 26: 196-201. [Crossref]
6. Bacela-Spychalska K., van der Velde G., 2013. "There is more than one ‘killer shrimp’: trophic positions and predatory abilities of invasive amphipods of Ponto-Caspian origin". Freshw. Biol., Vol 58: 730-741. [Crossref]
7. Bovy H. C., Barrios-O’Neill D., Emmerson M. C., Aldridge D. C., Dick J. T. A., 2015. "Predicting the predatory impacts of the “demon shrimp” Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, on native and previously introduced species". Biol. Invasions, Vol 17: 597-607. [Crossref]
8. Cardoso P., Erwin T. L., Borges P. A. V., New T. R., 2011. "The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them". Biol. Conserv., Vol 144: 2647-2655. [Crossref]
9. Constable D., Birkby N. J., 2016. "The impact of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus haemobaphes on leaf litter processing in UK rivers". Aquat. Ecol., Vol 50: 273-281. [Crossref]
10. Coulautti R. I., MacIsaac H. J., 2004. "A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species". Divers. Distrib., Vol 10: 135-141. [Crossref]
11. CBD, 2015. Convention on Biological Diversity. September 2015. Available online at https://www.cbd.int/.
12. Dick J. T. A., 1996. "Post-invasion amphipod communities of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland: influences of habitat selection and mutual predation". J. Anim. Ecol., Vol 65: 756-767. [Crossref]
13. Dick J. T. A., Platvoet D., 2000. "Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species". Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., Vol 267: 977-983. [Crossref]
14. Dobson M., 2013. Identifying invasive freshwater shrimps and isopods. (DEFRA, London).
15. Elliott J. M., 2005. "Day-night changes in the spatial distribution and habitat preferences of freshwater shrimps, Gammarus pulex, in a stony stream". Freshwater Biol., Vol 50: 552-566. [Crossref]
16. Environment Agency, 2003. River habitat survey in Britain and Ireland: field survey guidance manual. (HMSO, London).
17. Gaertner M., Breeyen A. D., Hui C., Richardson D. M., 2009. "Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis". Prog. Phys. Geogr., Vol 33: 319-338. [Crossref]
18. Gallardo B., Aldridge D. C., 2013. "The ‘dirty dozen’: socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland". J. Appl. Ecol., Vol 50: 757-766. [Crossref]
19. Gallardo B., Aldridge D. C., 2015. "Is Great Britain heading for a Ponto-Caspian invasional meltdown?" J. Appl. Ecol., Vol 52: 41-49. [Crossref]
20. Gledhill T., Sutcliffe D. W., Williams W. D., 1993. British freshwater Crustacea Malacostraca: a key with ecological notes. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publications, 52 . (Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside).
21. Gordon N. D., McMahon T. A., Finlayson B. L., Gippel C. J., Nathan R. J., 2004. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. (Wiley, Chichester).
22. Grabowski M., Jażdżewski K., Konopacka A., 2007. "Alien Crustacea in Polish waters — Amphipoda". Aquat. Invasions, Vol 2: 25-38. [Crossref]
23. Jackson M. C., 2015. "Interactions among multiple invasive animals". Ecology, Vol 96: 2035-2041. [Crossref]
24. Jackson M. C., Grey J., 2013. "Accelerating rates of freshwater invasions in the catchment of the River Thames". Biol. Invasions, Vol 15: 945-951. [Crossref]
25. Jażdżewski K., Konopacka A., Grabowski M., 2004. "Recent drastic changes in the gammarid fauna (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of the Vistula River deltaic system in Poland caused by alien invaders". Divers. Distrib., Vol 10: 81-87. [Crossref]
26. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), 2013. Invasive non-native species and wildlife disease. Available online at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5150 (accessed 10 January 2015).
27. Kelly D. W., Dick J. T. A., 2005. "Introduction of the non-indigenous amphipod Gammarus pulex alters population dynamics and diet of juvenile trout Salmo trutta". Freshwater Biol., Vol 50: 127-140. [Crossref]
28. Ketelaars H. A. M., 2004. "Range extensions of Ponto-Caspian aquatic invertebrates in continental Europe". In: Dumont H., Shiganova T. A., Niermann U. (eds.), Aquatic invasions in the Black, Caspian, and Mediterranean seas: 209-236. (Kluwer, Dordrecht). [Crossref]
29. Krisp H., Maier G., 2005. "Consumption of macroinvertebrates by invasive and native gammarids: a comparison". J. Limnol., Vol 64: 55-59. [Crossref]
30. Larson E. R., Olden J. D., Usio N., 2010. "Decoupled conservatism of Grinnellian and Eltonian niches in an invasive arthropod". Ecosphere, Vol 1: 1-13. [Crossref]
31. Leung B., Bossenbroek J. M., Lodge D. M., 2006. "Boats, pathways, and aquatic biological invasions: estimating dispersal potential with gravity models". Biol. Invasions, Vol 8: 241-254. [Crossref]
32. Lodge D. M., Hill A. H., 1994. "Factors governing species composition, population size, and productivity of cool-water crayfishes". Nord. J. Freshwater Res., Vol 69: 111-136.
33. Lohrer A. M., Whitlatch R. B., 2002. "Relative impacts of two exotic brachyuran species on blue mussel populations in Long Island Sound". Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., Vol 227: 135-144. [Crossref]
34. MacNeil C., Dick J. T. A., 2014. "Physicochemical tolerance, habitat use and predation are drivers of patterns of coexistence and exclusion among invasive and resident amphipods". Freshwater Biol., Vol 59: 1956-1969. [Crossref]
35. MacNeil C., Platvoet D., Dick J. T. A., Fielding N., Constable A., Hall N., Aldridge D., Renals T., Diamond M., 2010. "The Ponto-Caspian ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), invades the British Isles". Aquat. Invasions, Vol 5: 441-445. [Crossref]
36. Magurran A. E., 2009. Measuring biological diversity. (Blackwell, Oxford).
37. Mantzorou D., 2013. How do non-native shrimp species fit into Thames food web structure? (MSc thesis, Queen Mary University London, London).
38. Murray-Bligh J. A. D., 1999. Procedure for collecting and analysing macro-invertebrate samples. Quality management systems for environmental biology: biological techniques, BT001 Version 2.0. (Environment Agency, Bristol).
39. Oreska M. P. J., Aldridge D. C., 2011. "Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: a standardized approach to invasive species costing". Biol. Invasions, Vol 13: 305-319. [Crossref]
40. Petren K., Case T. J., 1996. "An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion". Ecology, Vol 77: 118-132. [Crossref]
41. Pöckl M., 1988. "Bestimmungsschlüssel für peracarida der österreichischen Donau (Crustacea, Malacostraca)". Wasser Abwasser, Vol 32: 89-110.
42. R Development Core Team, 2015. R 3.1.1. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, available online at http://www.R-project.org/.
43. Rahel F. J., Olden J. D., 2008. "Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species". Conserv. Biol., Vol 22: 521-533. [Crossref]
44. Ricciardi A., Rasmussen J. B., 1998. "Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management". Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., Vol 55: 1759-1765. [Crossref]
45. Richter B. D., Braun D. P., Mendelson M. A., Master L. L., 1997. "Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna". Conserv. Biol., Vol 11: 1081-1093. [Crossref]
46. Roy H. E., Peyton J., Aldridge D. C., Bantock T., Blackburn T. M., Britton R., Clark P., Cook E., Dehnen-Schmutz K., Dines T., Dobson M., Edwards F., Harrower C., Harvey M. C., Minchin D., Noble D. G., Parrott D., Pocock M. J. O., Preston C. D., Roy S., Salisbury A., Schönrogge K., Sewell J., Shaw R. H., Stebbing P., Stewart A. J. A., Walker K. J., 2014. "Horizon scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain". Global Change Biol., Vol 20: 3859-3871. [Crossref]
47. Sala O. E., Chapin F. S., Armesto J. J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L. F., Jackson R. B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D. M., Mooney H. A., Oesterheld M., Poff N. L., Sykes M. T., Walker B. H., Walker M., Wall D. H., 2000. "Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100". Science, Vol 287: 1770-1774. [Crossref]
48. Slothouber Galbreath J. G. M., Smith J. E., Becnel J. J., Butlin R. K., Dunn A. M., 2010. "Reduction in post-invasion genetic diversity in Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Amphipoda: Crustacea): a genetic bottleneck or the work of hitchhiking vertically transmitted microparasites?" Biol. Invasions, Vol 12: 191-209. [Crossref]
49. Strayer D. L., 2009. "Twenty years of zebra mussels: lessons from the mollusk that made headlines". Front. in Ecol. Environ., Vol 7: 135-141. [Crossref]
50. Truhlar A. M., Aldridge D. C., 2015. "Differences in behavioural traits between two potentially invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus and Gammarus pulex". Biol. Invasions, Vol 17: 1569-1579. [Crossref]
51. Wheater P. C., Bell J. R., Cook P. A., 2011. Practical field ecology: a project guide. (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester).
52. Wilson E. O., 1987. "The little things that run the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates)". Conserv. Biol., Vol 1: 344-346. [Crossref]
53. Zamin T. J., Baillie J. E. M., Miller R. M., Rodriguez J. P., Ardid A., Collen B., 2010. "National Red Listing beyond the 2010 target". Conserv. Biol., Vol 24: 1012-1020. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685403-00003665
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685403-00003665
2017-03-22
2017-11-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Crustaceana — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation