Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Assessment of the use of high-performance capillary gel electrophoresis to differentiate isolates of Globodera spp.

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

For more content, see Nematologica.

Capillary gel electrophoresis was used to characterise 49 Portuguese isolates of potato cyst nematodes, three of Globodera pallida and 46 of G. rostochiensis, and eight isolates representative of pathotypes defined for these two species (Ro1, Ro2, Ro3, Ro4 and Ro5 for G. rostochiensis and Pa1, Pa2 and Pa3 for G. pallida). Protein extracts of four samples of 50 cysts per isolate were separated using a Beckman eCAP SDS 14-200 kit, in a capillary of 57 cm length and 100 μ m internal diameter and with a run time of 40 min. Reproducible protein profiles were obtained and the isolates were compared taking into account the relative migration time and area of each peak recorded by the Gold Software Data System (Beckman). Euclidian distances between isolates were calculated using peak area data and a dendrogram was constructed according to the UPGMA method. Portuguese isolates showed great variability and it seems that protein composition is not related to their geographic origin. Protein profiles of each pathotype were obtained and some of the proteins seem to be specific for each pathotype. However, despite their common reaction to the H1 resistance gene, Ro1 and Ro4 were not grouped together, and Pa1 was not grouped with Pa2.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854106776179980
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156854106776179980
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854106776179980
2006-03-01
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Nematology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation