Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Host status of six major weeds to Meloidogyne chitwoodi and Pratylenchus penetrans, including a preliminary field survey concerning other weeds

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Nematology
For more content, see Nematologica.

A glasshouse experiment was carried out to investigate the host status of six important weeds in intensive agricultural cropping systems to Meloidogyne chitwoodi and Pratylenchus penetrans. Senecio vulgaris L., Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic. and Solanum nigrum L. were hosts of M. chitwoodi with reproduction factors of 2.5, 2.6 and 7.8, respectively. Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. and Stellaria media (L.) Vill. were non-hosts for M. chitwoodi as no galls or eggs were observed. Galinsoga parviflora Cav. is considered a poor host with one out of eight plants producing an egg mass, but maintaining significantly higher population densities in the soil than were recorded in the fallow pots. Echinochloa crusgalli, S. nigrum and S. vulgaris were hosts of P. penetrans with multiplication factors of 1.6, 1.82 and 4.29, respectively. The multiplication rate of P. penetrans on S. vulgaris was similar to the one recorded on maize, the susceptible control. Galinsoga parviflora, S. media and C. bursa-pastoris were non-hosts as no specimen of the target nematode was found in the roots. After 16 weeks, only 1.22 and 0.08% of the original population was still alive for P. penetrans and M. chitwoodi, respectively. In conjunction with the pot experiment, a field survey was conducted at two sites, each of which was known to be highly infested with either M. chitwoodi or P. penetrans. Based on the survey results, Cirsium arvense Scop. and C. bursa-pastoris can also be considered to be hosts of M. chitwoodi, whilst Cirsium arvense, Chenopodium album L. and Polygonum convolvulus L. were recorded as hosts of P. penetrans. These results call attention to the possibility of weeds acting as carriers and point sources of possible high population densities of plant-parasitic nematodes. It emphasises the importance of adequate weed control in an integrated programme for management of M. chitwoodi and P. penetrans and the possible failure of the successful use of non-host crops and fallow in crop rotations when weed control is inadequate.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854106778877839
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156854106778877839
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854106778877839
2006-10-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Nematology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation