Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Comparative Dependence and Economic Development

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of International Journal of Comparative Sociology
For more content, see Comparative Sociology.

The studies of trade, then, can be summarized in the following way: (1) The intensity of trade has no systematic effect on the rate of economic growth. (2) The concentration of a country's exports in just a few commodities have the effect of reducing economic growth. (3) But the concentration of a country's exports in terms of their destination to a few other countries has no effect on the rate of economic growth. (4) The greater the export of raw materials or unprocessed goods, the lower the economic growth of a country. And (5) these effects are conditional on level of development, such that within the poorest stratum of countries, there does not appear to be any systematic effect of commodity concentration or composition but there is a positive effect of intensity. In reviewing these studies, the general conclusion is that it is not the amount of trade that affects economic growth, but the characteristics of form and composition which matter. These studies tend to analyze these effects separately; but it seems clear that a better and more complete analysis would combine all these characteristics, taking account simultaneously of how much of what type of product is traded from what type of country to what type of country. Steiber (1980) presents a design which begins to approach such a complete analysis, but a large amount of this work needs to be done. Further work on trade should shift in this direction. We now turn to the findings of the effects of foreign capital on economic growth.

10.1163/156854281X00064
/content/journals/10.1163/156854281x00064
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854281x00064
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156854281x00064
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854281x00064
1981-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Journal of Comparative Sociology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation