Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Extent and Limitations of the Contributions of Biology To Understanding Human Social Behaviour

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Netherlands Journal of Zoology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Animal Biology (Vol 53 and onwards).

My aim was to consider the extent and the limitations of usefulness of a biological approach in understanding human behaviour. It has been argued that this is facilitated by distinguishing successive levels of social complexity, each of which is affected by the 'sociocultural structure'. Whilst all social behaviour at each level is affected by both genetic and social (including cultural) factors, there are some aspects of individual behaviour whose biological bases are particularly clear. Differences in social experience play only a limited role in their development, and indirect evidence concerning their biological function is available. At the level of relationships, a biological approach helps to integrate diverse and otherwise independent facts into a coherent whole. Even at the level of the socio-cultural structure, some features can be related to basic human propensities. However much human behaviour is clearly neutral or even maladaptive in terms of natural selection. Some such cases can be understood in terms of the excessive expression of tendencies that were adaptive in our environment of evolutionary adaptedness but are no longer so under modern conditions, or as the result of the exploitation of some individuals by others. However in many cases the potency of the sociocultural forces in determining individual behaviour is paramount. Since the sociocultural structure is complex, each feature depending on many psychological characteristics of individuals, it may be remote from the psychological mechanisms on which natural selection acted.

Affiliations: 1: (MRC Unit on the Development and Integration of Behaviour, Madingley, Cambridge CB3 8AA, England

10.1163/156854290X00181
/content/journals/10.1163/156854290x00181
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854290x00181
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156854290x00181
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156854290x00181
1989-01-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Netherlands Journal of Zoology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation