Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The effect of particle orientation and/or position on two-dimensional shape measurements

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

This Article is currently unavailable for purchase.
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Particle shapes were measured based on the random positioned (R) method, the stable positioned (S) method and the stable positioned/constant orientated (S/C) method. The mean values ¯ and ζ¯ of two shape indices (circularity and smoothness ζ), previously defined, were calculated. It was found that smoothness ζ¯ was little affected by shape measuring methods, while circularity ¯ differed according to methods. By analyzing the change in circularity using model ellipsoidal particles, it was confirmed that the R method could more effectively evaluate particle shapes than can the S method, based on the results of the S/C method.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation