Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

An improved contact model for ball mill simulation by the discrete element method

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

This Article is currently unavailable for purchase.
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The discrete element method (DEM) has emerged as a powerful tool for simulating discrete particle systems. It has wide application in the field of mining and mineral processing where it can be used as a design and diagnostic tool for industrial size tumbling mills. The simulation of tumbling mills involves the calculation of contact forces between the colliding balls in order to predict the enmasse charge motion, ball wear, power draw, collision spectra, etc. These calculations are made by modeling the contact by a set of spring, dashpot and slider elements. The manner of implementation of these contact elements within the DEM framework and the associated contact parameters determine the accuracy of the simulation. A physically more realistic contact model based on theoretical contact mechanics is described. The model is not implementation specific and requires only material parameters that may be obtained from standard tests. In addition, the model allows for a variation in the coefficient of restitution as a function of impact velocity. The implementation of this contact model is illustrated by simulating a 0.545 m diameter ball mill.

10.1163/15685520252900938
/content/journals/10.1163/15685520252900938
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685520252900938
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685520252900938
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685520252900938
2017-11-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation