Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Binocular information in the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Recent evidence suggests that the visual control of prehension may be less dependent on binocular information than has previously been thought. Studies investigating this question, however, have generally only examined reaches to single objects presented in isolation, even though natural prehensile movements are typically directed at objects in cluttered scenes which contain many objects. The present study was designed, therefore, to assess the contribution of binocular information to the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes. Subjects reached for and grasped objects presented either in isolation or in the presence of one, two or four additional 'flanking' objects, under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. So that the role of binocular information could be clearly determined, subjects made reaches both in the absence of a visible scene around the target objects (self-illuminated objects presented in the dark) and under normal ambient lighting conditions. Analysis of kinematic parameters indicated that the removal of binocular information did not significantly affect many of the major indices of the transport component, including peak wrist velocity. However, peak grip apertures increased and subjects spent more time in the final slow phase of movement, prior to grasping the object, during monocularly guided reaches. The dissociation between effects of binocular versus monocular viewing on transport and grasp parameters was observed irrespective of the presence of flanking objects. These results therefore further question the view that binocular vision is pre-eminent in the control of natural prehensile movements.

10.1163/15685680252875138
/content/journals/10.1163/15685680252875138
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685680252875138
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685680252875138
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685680252875138
2002-04-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation