Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Increased visual after-effects in migraine following pattern adaptation extend to simultaneous tilt illusion

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Much previous research into visual processing in migraine supports a model of abnormal cortical processing, in between the headache attacks, that is characterised by hyperexcitability, heightened responsiveness, a lack of habituation and/or a lack of intra-cortical inhibition. Shepherd (2001) reported two adaptation studies that challenged this view, one using the tilt after-effect, the second using the motion after-effect. Models of cortical function in migraine based on hyperexcitability and a lack of inhibition lead to specific predictions in an adaptation study: there should have been smaller after-effects in people with migraine than in people without. Both experiments, however, revealed larger after-effects in the migraine group than in the control group. Here, these results are extended to the simultaneous tilt illusion and an identical pattern of results was obtained: there were consistently larger effects in the migraine group than in the control group. The results from the three experiments are not consistent with a lack of inhibition in migraine. The results are discussed in terms of alternative models of cortical function, including a lack of excitation and reduced central energy reserves.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation