Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A parametric account of contrast adaptation on contrast perception

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

The effect of contrast adaptation on perceived contrast is assessed by contrast matching spatially adjacent sinusoidal gratings of similar spatial frequency, but different contrast and orientation. The main empirical question asked is why a high contrast orthogonal adaptor appears to amplify contrast signals through an increase in the slope of the contrast matching function but does not affect the threshold contrast at which a grating is detected. To explain this effect of adaptation, the Naka-Rushton receptor equation is employed as a description of the visual system's contrast response function. It is reported that the effects of adaptation may be described by three isotropic components, namely, signal amplification, division and addition, and one orientation specific component of subtraction. By collating the predictions made by the Naka–Rushton receptor equation with existing psychophysical data, it is shown that the magnitude of the isotropic components of adaptation increase with the contrast of the adapting signal. The orientation specific effect, however, is shown to saturate at relatively low adapting contrast levels. This saturation appears to be inconsistent with the commonly held view that the orientation specific effect represents a functional strategy used by the visual system to combat the problem of neural saturation in response firing rates.

10.1163/15685680260433922
/content/journals/10.1163/15685680260433922
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685680260433922
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685680260433922
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685680260433922
2002-11-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation