Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The role of perceived relative position in pointing to objects apparently shifted by depth-contrast

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

This paper is concerned with the information used in open-loop pointing to visually perceived targets. Stereoscopic stimuli were used to produce illusory relative egocentric distances, which were inconsistent with the angles of vergence required to fuse the targets. One of the stimuli was a rectangle slanted around a vertical axis. Four participants in Experiment 1 reported its slant and pointed to its edges. The slant was hugely underestimated (condition A) unless the rectangle was flanked by other surfaces (condition B). The relative depth of a pair of dots placed in front of the rectangle was also misperceived due to depth-contrast effect. The critical finding is that pointing responses were not based on vergence but were consistent with depth estimates, both for the rectangle and for the dots. Experiment 2 revealed the conditions necessary for pointing to be consistent with perceived relative position. The different target distances were either randomised allowing inter-trial comparisons, or presented only one per session to prevent them. Pointing was similar to estimates only in the randomised condition showing the significance of inter-trial comparisons. It is proposed that participants used the remembered motor command and kinesthetic sensations of a previous movement as a reference, attempting to make the difference between successive movements the same as a visually perceived depth difference between successive targets.

10.1163/156856803322467563
/content/journals/10.1163/156856803322467563
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856803322467563
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856803322467563
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856803322467563
2003-09-01
2016-12-08

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation