Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Assessment of fused videos using scanpaths: a comparison of data analysis methods

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

The increased interest in image fusion (combining images of two or more modalities such as infrared and visible light radiation) has led to a need for accurate and reliable image assessment methods. Previous work has often relied upon subjective quality ratings combined with some form of computational metric analysis. However, we have shown in previous work that such methods do not correlate well with how people perform in actual tasks utilising fused images. The current study presents the novel use of an eye-tracking paradigm to record how accurately participants could track an individual in various fused video displays. Participants were asked to track a man in camouflage outfit in various input videos (visible and infrared originals, a fused average of the inputs; and two different wavelet-based fused videos) whilst also carrying out a secondary button-press task. The results were analysed in two ways, once calculating accuracy across the whole video, and by dividing the video into three time sections based on video content. Although the pattern of results depends on the analysis, the accuracy for the inputs was generally found to be significantly worse than that for the fused displays. In conclusion, both approaches have good potential as new fused video assessment methods, depending on what task is carried out.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Rd, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK; 2: Centre for Communications Research, University of Bristol, Merchant Venturers Building, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK

10.1163/156856807781503659
/content/journals/10.1163/156856807781503659
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856807781503659
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856807781503659
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856807781503659
2007-07-01
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation