Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Spatial location and hyperacuity: flank position within the centre and surround zones

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Sensitivity to a horizontal displacement of a vertical line was measured in order to ascertain the influence of the location of parallel flanking lines on the apparent position of features in visual space. The first experiment confirmed that the introduction of the flank added a component to the apparent shift which was towards the flank for small separations (less than 3-4') and away from the flank with larger separations. The second experiment investigated the notion that apparent location is derived by collecting information only from zones adjacent to the target and limited in the vertical extent by the target's height i.e. information orthogonal to the target's main axis. This was done by placing a vertical flank at a horizontal distance from the target that would be clearly within one zone or the other and measuring the effect of a vertical separation between the two flank halves. In the surround zone the amount of repulsion obtained was not influenced by vertical separation of the flank halves, even when they were several minutes higher (or lower) than the target line. In the central zone attraction was only obtained when the vertical separation was small enough to provide some overlap of the lines in the horizontal direction. With larger separations substantial repulsion was obtained. We conclude that while the central 'attraction' zone may only use information distributed in the direction of the line's displacement, it does so only within a 3-4' range on either side of the target line. The surround zone is not similarly limited in the region over which it collects information to influence the apparent location of features.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Physiology-Anatomy, University of California at Berkeley, California, CA 94720, USA

10.1163/156856885X00026
/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00026
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00026
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00026
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00026
1985-01-01
2016-12-07

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation