Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Spatial integration characteristics in motion detection and direction identification

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Spatial integration characteristics were assessed with drifting gratings for both detection and direction-identification contrast thresholds. Thresholds were measured while stimulus width, length or both were varied. It was found that: (1) the shape of the size/sensitivity functions changes with spatial, but not with temporal, frequency; (2) direction-identification thresholds diverge from the detection thresholds below 1 cycle but can be reliably measured for stimulus widths as small as 0.1275 cycles; (3) the integration characteristics are slightly anisotropic for the identification but not for the detection process, and (4) the two-dimensional spatial integration cannot be directly predicted from its one-dimensional characteristics. Width/sensitivity detection functions are well fitted by predictions of Wilson and Bergen's four-channel model. Predictions from a temporal covariance model provide a poor fit to the identification data. It is argued that classes of detection and direction-identification models must involve identical nonlinearities prior to their respective thresholds. It is concluded that the hypothesis according to which both performances are determined by the same spatial integration stage cannot be rejected.

Affiliations: 1: Laboratorie de Psychologie Expérimentale, Université René Descartes et EPHE 3ème section, associé au CNRS, 28 rue Serpente, 75006 Paris, France

10.1163/156856885X00116
/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00116
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00116
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00116
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856885x00116
1985-01-01
2016-12-08

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation