Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Asymmetries in visual texture discrimination

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Recent results have shown that texture discrimination is an asymmetrical process; texture A within texture B may be much easier to detect than texture B within texture A. Two questions regarding discrimination asymmetries are addressed: (i) what sorts of textural properties are associated with discrimination asymmetries; and (ii) what sort of architecture would yield asymmetries. Two experiments show that discrimination asymmetries obtain when textures comprise circles of different sizes (large circles are easier to detect in small than vice versa) and when circles differ only in the regularity of their placement (irregularly placed circles are easier to detect in a background of regularly placed circles than vice versa). A plausible account of texture discrimination would involve the decomposition of images via a set orientation and scale selective filters followed by a second layer of filtering to detect energy differences between adjacent regions in the original convolutions. Discrimination asymmetries provide prima facie evidence against such a model because it involves only local measurements and comparisons. We propose that discrimination asymmetries are elegantly explained if it is assumed that the responses of the orientation and scale selective filters are normalized by the degree to which similarly tuned operators are responding elsewhere in the image; viz., global normalization of filter responses. However, there are cases where such global normalization is not required to explain asymmetrical discrimination.

Affiliations: 1: Departments of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada; 2: Departments of Computing & Information Science and Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

10.1163/156856889X00031
/content/journals/10.1163/156856889x00031
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856889x00031
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856889x00031
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856889x00031
1989-01-01
2016-12-08

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation