Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Pattern-specific contrast threshold elevation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Visual channels are defined psychophysically; stimuli that interact share information in the same channel, and those that do not interact are processed in different channels. Channels are often investigated by means of adaptation to one stimulus, testing contrast threshold elevation with one (or more) others. Much recent work has tested the tuning of channels for orientation and spatial frequency, using simple line gratings. This study examined the pattern-specificity of such adaptation, testing the hypothesis that the fundamental operators of the Lie Transformation Group Theory of Neuropsychology (LTG/NP) define psychophysical channels. In Experiment I the three basic pattern pairs of LTG/NP were used as adaptation and test stimuli in a conventional contrast threshold-elevation experiment. Threshold elevation was pattern-specific, thus supporting the hypothesis. In subsequent experiments various 'fractured' patterns, and patterns generated by combinations of Lie operators were used both for adaptation and test. The results were mixed; some supported the original hypothesis, but many did not. Relations between local contour orientations in adaptation and test patterns could explain some results, but not all. The hypothesis that adaptation occurs to the oriented spatial-frequency components of the test patterns, on the other hand, gave a good fit to the data. It is concluded that there is pattern-specificity in contrast threshold elevation, but it is a form of specificity that can be explained without recourse to a model of geometrical pattern processing, at least for the simple patterns used here.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

10.1163/156856891X00074
/content/journals/10.1163/156856891x00074
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856891x00074
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856891x00074
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856891x00074
1991-01-01
2016-12-07

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation