Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Segmenting textures using cells with adaptive receptive fields

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Spatial Vision
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Seeing and Perceiving.

Textural segmentation plays an important role in the figure-ground discrimination process. Evidence from neuroscience and psychophysics suggests that the segregation of texture patterns composed of oriented line segments is strongly influenced by the orientation contrast between the patterns (Nothdurft, Vision Res. 31, 1073-1078, 1991). In contrast to models available in the literature, this paper presents a neural network architecture for textural segmentation that can adaptively delimit the boundaries of uniformly textured regions. Cells with adaptive receptive fields encode uniformly textured regions by diffusively interpolating the estimates of feature orientations across the image. Orientation contrast boundaries are detected at gradients across the interpolated regions to produce the final segmentation. Consistent with neurophysiological data from simple and complex cells sensitive to static and moving textural patterns (Hammond and MacKay, Exp. Brain Res. 30, 275-296, 1977), the present model suggests that preattentive textural segregation can be performed by early visual processes localized to areas V1, V2, and perhaps V3 or V5. The computational results further support the idea that textural segmentation should not be thought of as a 'static' process, but as a system that employs cells with context-dependent response characteristics (Gilbert and Wiesel, Vision Res. 30, 1689-1701, 1990), here modeled as adaptive receptive fields.

Affiliations: 1: Machine Perception Laboratory, Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA

10.1163/156856895X00179
/content/journals/10.1163/156856895x00179
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856895x00179
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156856895x00179
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156856895x00179
1995-01-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Spatial Vision — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation