Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A Comparative Cyberconflict Analysis of Digital Activism Across Post-Soviet Countries

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Comparative Sociology
For content published from 1960-2001, see International Journal of Comparative Sociology.

This article analyses digital activism comparatively in relation to three Post-Soviet regions: Russian/anti-Russian in Crimea and online political deliberation in Belarus, in juxtaposition to Estonia’s digital governance approach. The authors show that in civil societies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, cultural forms of digital activism, such as internet memes, thrive and produce and reproduce effective forms of political deliberation. In contrast to Estonia, in authoritarian regimes actual massive mobilization and protest is forbidden, or is severely punished with activists imprisoned, persecuted or murdered by the state. This is consistent with use of cultural forms of digital activism in countries where protest is illegal and political deliberation is restricted in government-controlled or oligarchic media. Humorous political commentary might be tolerated online to avoid mobilization and decompress dissent and resistance, yet remaining strictly within censorship and surveillance apparatuses. The authors’ research affirms the potential of internet memes in addressing apolitical crowds, infiltrating casual conversations and providing symbolic manifestation to resistant debates. Yet, the virtuality of the protest undermines its consistency and impact on offline political deliberation. Without knowing each other beyond social media, the participants are unlikely to form robust organisational structures and mobilise for activism offline.

Affiliations: 1: University of LeicesterUK ; 2: University of LeicesterUK ; 3: University of WestminsterUK


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Aliaksandrau A."“Belarus: Pulling the Plug” (Index on censorship)" 2013 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
2. Artsiomenka A."“(De)-consolidation of Civil Society in Belarus: Decreased Potential for Solidarity Action, De-politicisation, Disagreement about values”" Civil Society in Belarus 2000-2015 Collection of Texts 2015 Warsaw East European Democratic Centre Retrieved October 10 ().
3. Atton C. An Alternative Internet 2004 Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press [Crossref]
4. Bauman S., Lyon D. Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation 2013 Cambridge Polity
5. Belkin I. 2014 June 24 Interview with Anastasia Denisova, Moscow.
6. Bennett W.L. Couldry J., Curran N."“New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism”" Contesting Media Power 2003 Lanham Rowman and Littlefield 17 37
7. Bennett W.L., Segerberg"“The Logic of Connective Action”" Information, Communication & Society 2012Vol 15 739 768 [Crossref]
8. Brel Y."“Re-envisioning Civil Society in the Republic of Belarus”" 2015 ma Dissertation. University of Delaware, School of Public Policy and Administration. Retrieved October 10 ().
9. Bruns A."“Produsage: Towards a Broader Framework for User-Led Content Creation”" Creativity and Cognition: Proceedinds of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & Cognition 2007 Washington, DC ACM
10. Bugorkova O."“Ukraine Conflict: Inside Russia’s ‘Kremlin troll army’ bbc Monitoring, 19 March 2015)”" 2015 (bbc). Retrieved October 10 ().
11. Chomsky N."“Responsibility and Integrity: The Dilemmas We Face”" 2011 Presented at the lecture for Social Responsibility of the Artist March 15 Utrecht University, Utrecht
12. Castells M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in The Internet Age 2012 Cambridge Polity
13. Dahlberg L., Siapera E. Radical Democracy and the Internet 2007 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
14. Deibert R., Rohozinski R."“Control and Subversion in Russian Cyberspace”" Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights and Rule in Cyberspace 2010 Retrieved October 10 ().
15. Dion D."“Evidence and inference in the comparative case study”" Comparative Politics 1998Vol 30 1 127 146 [Crossref]
16. Esteves V., Meikle G."“Look @ this fukken doge: Internet Memes and Remix Cultures”" The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media 2015 New York Routledge 561 570
17. edri-gram"“New Belarus Internet Regulations Require Compulsory Web Registration”" Digital Civil Rights in Europe 2010 May 10 Retrieved October 10 ().
18. @Fake_MIDRF. 9 September 2014. Email Interview with Anastasia Denisova.
19. Fossato F.J., Lloyd, Verkhovsky A. The Web That Failed: How Opposition Politics and Independent Initiatives are Failing on the Internet in Russia 2008 Oxford Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
20. Freedom House Freedom on the Net 2013: A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media 2013 Retrieved October 10 ().
21. Freedom House Freedom on the Net 2016: Estonia 2016 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
22. Fuchs C., Boersma K., Albrechtslund A., Sandoval M. Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media 2012 London and New York Routledge
23. Fuchs C., Dyer-Witheford N."“Karl Marx @ Internet Studies”" New Media and Society 2012Vol 15 782 796 [Crossref]
24. Garrett R.K."“Protest in an Information Society. A Review of Literature on Social Movements and new icts”" Information, Communication & Society 2006Vol 9 202 224 [Crossref]
25. Garnham N. Morin Céline"“Économie Politique et Cultural Studies: Réconciliation ou Divorce?”" Réseaux 2015 [1995]Vol 192 45 65
26. George A.L., Bennett A. . Case studies and theory development in the social sciences 2005 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
27. Gerbaudo P."“Constructing Public Space| Rousing the Facebook Crowd: Digital Enthusiasm and Emotional Contagion in the 2011 Protests in Egypt and Spain”" International Journal of Communication 2016Vol 10 254 273
28. Goriunova O."“The Force of Digital Aesthetics: On Memes, Hacking, and Individuation”" Zeitschrift fur Medienwissenschaft 2013Vol 8 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
29. Goscilo H. Putin as Celebrity and Cultural Icon 2012Vol Vol. 80 London and New York Routledge
30. Herasimenka A."“Belarus. Two Hidden Mechanisms of Media Censorship”" 2016 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
31. Ioffe J."“Meet the Persident”" Foreign Policy 2011 January 3 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
32. Jenkins H. Confronting The Challenges of Participatory Culture for the 21st century 2009 Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press
33. Kachkaeva A."“Voina iz okopov peremestilas na divany: Anna Kachkaeva o novoy rossiyskoy propagande [The war moved from trenches to sofas: Anna Kachkaeva on the new Russian propaganda]”" 2015 February 11 Interview by Anna Stroganova, rfi . Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
34. Karatzogianni A. Firebrand Waves of Digital Activism 1994-2014 2015 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan [Crossref]
35. Karatzogianni A. Karatzogianni A., Kuntsman A."“WikiLeaks Affects: Ideology, Conflict and the Revolutionary Virtual”" Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion: Feelings, Affect and Technological Change 2012a Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 52 73 [Crossref]
36. Karatzogianni A. Karatzogianni A., Kuntsman A."“Epilogue: The Politics of the Affective Digital”" Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion: Feelings, Affect and Technological Change 2012b Palgrave Macmillan 245 249 [Crossref]
37. Karatzogianni A."“Blame it on the Russians: Tracking the Portrayal of Russians During Cyber Conflict Incidents”" Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 2010Vol 4 127 150 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
38. Karatzogianni A. The Politics of Cyberconflict 2006 London Routledge
39. Karatzogianni A., Morgunova O., Kambouri N., Lafazani O., Trimikliniotis N., Ioannou G., Nguyen D."“Transnational Digital Networks, Migration and Gender: Intercultural Conflict and Dialogue”" 2013 Online MIG@NET.EU Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
40. Kelly J., Barash V., Alexanyan K., Etling B., Faris R., Gasser U., Palfrey J.G. Mapping Russian Twitter 2012 Berkman Center Research Publication
41. Kiriya I."“Piracy Cultures| The Culture of Subversion and Russian Media Landscape”" International Journal Of Communication 2012Vol 6 446 466 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
42. Knobel M., Lankshear C."“Online Memes, Affinities and Cultural Production”" A New Literacies Sampler 2007 New York Peter Lang 199 227
43. Kreegipuu T., Lauk E."“Was It All Pure Propaganda? Journalistic Practices Of ‘Silent Resistance’ In Soviet Estonian Journalism”" Acta Historica Tallinnensia 2010Vol 15 167 190 [Crossref]
44. Kovalev A. 2014 June 15 Email Interview with Anastasia Denisova.
45. Kremlin Pryamaya Liniya s Vladimirom Putinym 2014 Complete Transcript, 17 April 2014. Retrieved October 10 2016 ().@KermlinRussia. 10 July 2014. Interview with Anastasia Denisova, Moscow.
46. Kuzio T."“Competing Nationalisms, Euromaidan, and the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict”" Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 2015Vol 15 157 169 [Crossref]
47. Khvoin V."“The Mad Tea Partier of Minsk”" 2012 tol . Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
48. Laruelle M."“The ‘Russian Idea’ on the Small Screen: Staging National Identity on Russia’s tv”" Demokratizatsiya. The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 2014Vol 22 313 333
49. Lasn K. Culture Jam 1999 New York Quill
50. Lauk E., Jufereva M."“Reversed censorship? Assessing media self-regulation in the Baltic countries”" Mediální studia 2010Vol 1 31 46
51. Li S."“The Online Public Space and Popular Ethos in China”" Media, Culture & Society 2010Vol 32 63 83 [Crossref]
52. Lievrouw L.A. Alternative and Activist New Media 2011 Cambridge Polity
53. Lijphart A."“Comparative politics and the comparative method”" American political science review 1971Vol 65 682 693 [Crossref]
54. Lobodenko G., Kozlik I."“Za razbitye mashiny iz ‘zhivogo shchita’ pod Minskom zaplatit gai? [gai to pay for the broken cars in ‘human shields’ near Minsk]”" Komsomolskaya Pravda 2008 March 14 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
55. Mahoney J."“Qualitative methodology and comparative politics”" Comparative Political Studies 2007Vol 40 122 144 [Crossref]
56. Matthews J.T."“Passé, présent et potentiel des plateformes collaboratives. Réflexions sur la production culturelle et les dispositifs d’intermédiation numérique”" Les Enjeux de l’Information et de la Communication 2015Vol 16 57 71
57. McCaughey M., Ayers M. Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice 2003 New York and London Routledge
58. Meikle G. Ratto M., Boler M."“Social Media, Visibility, and Activism: The Kony 2012 Campaign”" diy Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media 2014 Cambridge MIT Press 373 384
59. Metahaven"“Can Jokes Bring Down Governments?”" Memes, Design, Politics 2013 Moscow Strelka Press
60. Milner R.M."“Media Lingua Franca: Fixity, Novelty, and Vernacular Creativity in Internet Memes”" Selected Papers of Internet Research 2013Vol 3
61. Miazhevich G."“Sites of Subversion: Online Political Satire in two post-Soviet states”" Media, Culture and Society 2015Vol 37 422 439 [Crossref]
62. Morozov E. The Net Delusion: How not to Liberate the World 2011 London Allen Lane
63. Morozov E."“The Meme Hustler”" The Baffler 2013Vol 22 Retrieved October 10 2016 (). [Crossref]
64. "“Iz zhizni sumerechnykh reptiliy i nochnykh gadov [The Life of Twilight Reptiles and Nocturnal Scuts]”" 2016 September 23 23 September. Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
65. O’Reilly T. What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software 2005 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
66. Papacharissi Z. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics 2015 Oxford University Press
67. Parker S. The Last Soviet Republic: Alexander Lukashenko’s Belarus 2007 Bloomington, IN Trafford Publishing
68. Pearce K."“Two Can Play at That Game: Social Media Opportunities in Azerbaijan for Government and Opposition”" Demokratizatsiya 2014Vol 22 1 39
69. Pet’ko P."“Podesheveet li mobilnyi internet v Belarusi [The Mobile Internet to Become Cheaper]?" 2013 Retrieved October 10 2016 .
70. Population Census 2009 .
71. Raley R. Tactical Media 2009Vol Vol. 28 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press
72. Rees E.A. Apor B., Behrends J.C., Jones C., Rees E.A."“Introduction: Leader Cults, Varieties and Preconditions”" The Leader Cult in Communist Dictatorships 2004 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillian 1 26 1-26 [Crossref]
73. Rezaev A.V., Zhikharevich D.M., D., Lisitsyn P.P."“The Marxist Materialist Interpretation of History and Comparative Sociology”" Comparative Sociology 2015Vol 14 452 477 [Crossref]
74. Rice-Oxley M."“Belarus: 20 Years Under Dictatorship and a Revolution Behind the Rest of Europe”" The Guardian 2014 June 9 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
75. Roberts H., Etling B."“Coordinated DDoS Attack During Russian Duma Elections”" The Harvard Law Internet and Democracy Blog 2011 December 8Vol 8
76. Rothrock K."“The Russians Have Weaponized Photoshop”" Global Voices 2014 March 1 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
77. Ryzhkov V."“Kremlin Doesn’t Have Monopoly on Patriotism”" The Moscow Times 2015 April 9 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
78. Semetko H.A., Krasnoboka N."“The Political Role of the Internet in Societies in Transition: Russia and Ukraine compared”" Party Politics 2003Vol 9 77 104 [Crossref]
79. Scholz T."“Market Ideology and the Myths of Web 2.0”" First Monday 2008Vol 13 3 (). [Crossref]
80. Shifman L."“Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker”" Journal of Computer-Mediated CommunicationVol 18 362 377 Retrieved October 10 2016 2013. [Crossref]
81. Skocpol T., Somers M."“The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry”" Comparative Studies in Society and History 1980Vol 22 1 174 197 [Crossref]
82. Theocharis Y."“The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation”" Social Media+ Society 2015Vol 1 2 1 14
83. "“Estonia Enjoys Most Internet Freedom, Uzbekistan Among Those With the Least”" 2016 November 15 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
84. Van de Donk W., Loader B., Nixon P., Rucht D. Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements 2004 London and New York Routledge (Eds.)
85. van Laer J."“Internet Use and Protest Participation: How do icts Affect Mobilisation?”" 2007 pcw paper. Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
86. Volkov D., Goncharov S."“Russian Media Landscape: Television, Print and the Internet”" 2014 Report, Levada-Centre, June 2014. Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
87. Weekes L.A."“Country as a Service Estonian e-Residency and the Platformization of the Political”" 2016 Paper presented at the The Political Economy of Platformization International Colloquium December 6 University of Leicester
88. Wilson A Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World 2005 New Haven CT
89. Yuhas A."“Russian propaganda over Crimea and the Ukraine: how does it work?”" The Guardian 2014 March 17 Retrieved October 10 2016 ().
90. Zuckerman E. Allen D., Light J."“Cute Cats to the Rescue? Participatory Media and Political Expression”" Youth, New Media and Political Participation 2013 Cambridge MIT Press

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Comparative Sociology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation