Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Political Competition in Sweden 1976-2014

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

A Comparative Analysis at the Local Level

image of Comparative Sociology
For content published from 1960-2001, see International Journal of Comparative Sociology.

The main purpose of this study is to examine political competition on the local level in Sweden and to empirically test two theories of political competition, namely whether the size of the unit affects the variation in political competition and whether socioeconomic standards affect the variation in political competition. The findings support the suggested causal mechanism between socioeconomic standards and competition. Accordingly, units with higher socioeconomic standards have a higher level of political competition. Some empirical findings also support the suggested causal mechanism between the size of the units and the political competition. The findings show that population size is a robust determinant of competition and that a larger population size affects competition positively. The findings show also that area size is a relatively robust determinant of competition and that area size has a negative effect on competition. However the negative effect is contrary to the expectations.

Affiliations: 1: Associate Professor in Political Science, Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University ÖstersundSweden


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Achen C. H. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables 2000 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association July 2000 UCLA Ann Arbor
2. Aistrup J. A."State legislative party competition: A county-level measure" Political Research Quarterly 1993Vol 46 2 433 446 [Crossref]
3. Aistrup J. A."Constituency diversity and party competition: A county and state level analysis" Political Research Quarterly 2004Vol 57 2 267 281 [Crossref]
4. Altman D., Pérez-Liñán A."Assessing the quality of democracy: Freedom, competitiveness and participation in eighteen Latin American countries" Democratization 2002Vol 9 2 85 100 [Crossref]
5. Anckar C. Storlek och partisystem: en studie av 77 stater 1998 Åbo Åbo Akademis Förlag
6. Anckar C."Size, islandness, and democracy: A global comparison" International political science review 2008Vol 29 4 433 459 [Crossref]
7. Anckar D."Homogeneity and smallness: Dahl and Tufte revisited" Scandinavian Political Studies 1999Vol 22 1 29 44 [Crossref]
8. Bartolini S."Collusion, Competition and Democracy Part i" Journal of Theoretical Politics 1999Vol 11 4 435 470 [Crossref]
9. Bartolini S."Collusion, Competition and Democracy Part ii" Journal of Theoretical Politics 2000Vol 12 1 33 65 [Crossref]
10. Beck N."Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years?" Annual Review of Political Science 2001Vol 4 1 271 293 [Crossref]
11. Beck N., Katz J. N."What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data" American Political Science Review 1995 634 647 [Crossref]
12. Beck N., Katz J. N."Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models" Political Analysis 1996Vol 6 1 1 36 [Crossref]
13. Beck N., Katz J. N."Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data" Annual Review of Political Science 2011Vol 14 331 352 [Crossref]
14. Bäck H. Explaining coalitions: evidence and lessons from studying coalition formation in Swedish local government 2003 Uppsala University
15. Bäck H., Hadenius A."Democracy and State Capacity: Exploring a J‐Shaped Relationship" Governance 2008Vol 21 1 1 24 [Crossref]
16. Casstevens T. W., Press C."The context of democratic competition in American state politics" American Journal of Sociology 1963 536 543 [Crossref]
17. Dahl R. A. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition 1971 New Haven, CT Yale University Press
18. Dahl R. A. Democracy and its Critics 1989 New Haven and London Yale University Press
19. Dahl R. A., Tufte E. R. Size and democracy 1973 Stanford University Press
20. Dawson R. E., Robinson J. A."Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states" The Journal of Politics 1963Vol 25 02 265 289 [Crossref]
21. Denk T."Size and Political Support on the Local Level in Sweden" Local Government Studies 2012Vol 38 6 777 793 [Crossref]
22. Diamond L. Diamond L., Platter M. F."Three Paradoxes of Democracy" The Global Resurgence of Democracy 1996 Baltimore and London Johns Hopkins University Press 111 123
23. Downs A."An economic theory of political action in a democracy" The Journal of Political Economy 1957 135 150 [Crossref]
24. Dye T. R. Politics, economics, and the public: policy outcomes in the American states 1966 Chicago Rand McNally & Company
25. Fox J. Regression diagnostics 1991 Thousand Oaks SAGE Publications [Crossref]
26. Franklin M. N. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945 2004 Cambridge Cambridge University Press [Crossref]
27. Gerring J., Palmer M., Teorell J., Zarecki D."Demography and democracy: A global, district-level analysis of electoral contestation" American Political Science Review 2015Vol 109 03 574 591 [Crossref]
28. Hill K. Q. Democracy in the fifty states 1994 Lincoln and London University of Nebraska Press
29. Högström J. Quality of Democracy Around the Globe: A Comparative Study 2013 Östersund, Sweden Mid Sweden University Doctoral Thesis
30. Högström J."Democracies in crisis" Contemporary Politics 2014Vol 20 4 402 420 [Crossref]
31. Karlsson D."A Democracy of Scale. Size and Representative Democracy in Swedish Local Government" Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 2013Vol 17 1 7 28
32. Keele L., Kelly N. J."Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables" Political Analysis 2006Vol 14 2 186 205 [Crossref]
33. King G., Keohane R. O., Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research 1994 Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University Press
34. Kittel B."Sense and sensitivity in pooled analysis of political data" European Journal of Political Research 1999Vol 35 2 225 253
35. Kittel B., Winner H."How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization‐welfare state nexus revisited" European Journal of Political Research 2005Vol 44 2 269 293 [Crossref]
36. Larsen C. A."Municipal size and democracy: a critical analysis of the argument of proximity based on the case of Denmark" Scandinavian Political Studies 2002Vol 25 4 317 332 [Crossref]
37. Lassen D. D., Serritzlew S. "Jurisdiction size and local democracy: evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform" American Political Science Review 2011Vol 105 2 238 258 [Crossref]
38. Moraski B. J., Reisinger W. M."Explaining electoral competition across Russia’s regions" Slavic Review 2003 278 301 [Crossref]
39. Morehouse S. M. State politics, parties and policy 1981 New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston
40. Newton K."Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effectiveness, and democracy in local government" Political Studies 1982Vol 30 2 190 206 [Crossref]
41. Pinto P. M., Timmons J. F."The Political Determinants of Economic Performance Political Competition and the Sources of Growth" Comparative Political Studies 2005Vol 38 1 26 50 [Crossref]
42. Plümper T., Troeger V. E., Manow P."Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory" European Journal of Political Research 2005Vol 44 2 327 354 [Crossref]
43. Reuveny R., Li Q."Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality An Empirical Analysis" Comparative Political Studies 2003Vol 36 5 575 601 [Crossref]
44. Statistics Sweden 2016 Last accessed June 30, 2016 From
45. Strøm K."Inter-party competition in advanced democracies" Journal of Theoretical Politics 1989Vol 1 3 277 300 [Crossref]
46. Strøm K."Democracy as political competition" American Behavioral Scientist 1992Vol 35 4-5 375 396 [Crossref]
47. Teune H., Przeworski A. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry 1970 Malabar, Florida Krieger Publishing Company
48. Tripp A. M., Kang A."The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation" Comparative Political Studies 2008Vol 41 3 338 361 [Crossref]
49. Vanhanen T. Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries 1997 London and New York Routledge
50. Vanhanen T."A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998" Journal of Peace Research 2000Vol 37 2 251 265 [Crossref]
51. Vanhanen T. Democratization: A comparative analysis of 170 countries 2003 London and New York Routledge
52. Wright J."Political competition and democratic stability in new democracies" British journal of political science 2008Vol 38 02 221 245 [Crossref]

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Comparative Sociology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation