Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln: A Curious Convergence*

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the Brill platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Historical Materialism

[Abstract Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln held very different views on the ‘social question’. This essay explores the way in which they converged in their estimation of slavery during the course of the Civil War; Marx was an ardent abolitionist, and Lincoln came to see this position as necessary. It is argued that the rôle of runaway slaves – called ‘contraband’ – and German-revolutionary ’48ers played a significant rôle in the radicalisation of Lincoln and the direction of the War., AbstractKarl Marx and Abraham Lincoln held very different views on the ‘social question’. This essay explores the way in which they converged in their estimation of slavery during the course of the Civil War; Marx was an ardent abolitionist, and Lincoln came to see this position as necessary. It is argued that the rôle of runaway slaves – called ‘contraband’ – and German-revolutionary ’48ers played a significant rôle in the radicalisation of Lincoln and the direction of the War.]

1. Anderson Benedict Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism 1996 London Verso
2. Ashworth John Slavery, Capitalism, and Politics in the Antebellum Republic, Volume 1: Commerce and Compromise, 1820–1850 1995 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
3. Ashworth John Slavery, Capitalism, and Politics in the Antebellum Republic, Volume 2: The Coming of the Civil War, 1850–1861 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
4. Barkin Kenneth"‘Ordinary Germans, Slavery and the U.S. Civil War’" The Journal of African American History 2008Vol 93 1 70 79
5. Bensel Richard Franklin Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877 1990 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press
6. Blackburn Robin"‘State of the Union’" New Left Review 2010Vol II 61 153 174
7. Bruce Robert 1877: Year of Violence 1959 New York Bobbs-Merrill Company
8. Buhle Paul Marxism in the United States: Remapping the History of the American Left 1991 London Verso
9. Burbank David Reign of the Rabble: The St Louis General Strike of 1877 1978 [1966] New York A.M. Kelley
10. Crofts Daniel Ford Lacy K."‘And the War Came’" A Companion to the Civil War and Reconstruction 2005 Oxford Blackwell
11. Draper Hal Karl Marx’s Theory of Revolution, Volume 3: The ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’ 1986 New York Monthly Review Press
12. Dunayevskaya Raya Marxism and Freedom: From 1776 Until Today 1971 [1958] London Pluto Press
13. Engels Friedrich Marx, Engels"‘Engels to Marx’" 1961 [1861] 1961
14. Fernbach David Fernbach David"‘Introduction’" Karl Marx: The First International and After 1974 Harmondsworth Penguin
15. Foner Eric Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War 1970 Oxford Oxford University Press
16. Foner Eric Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 1988 New York Harper and Row
17. Foner Eric Foner"‘Lincoln and Colonization’" 2008 2008
18. Foner Eric The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery 2010 New York W.W. Norton and Company
19. Foner Eric Our Lincoln: New Perspectives on Lincoln and His World 2008 New York W.W. Norton and Company
20. Foner Philip S. The Great Labor Uprising of 1877 1977 New York Monad Press
21. Fredrickson George M. Big Enough to Be Inconsistent: Abraham Lincoln Confronts Slavery and Race 2008 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press
22. Gallagher Gary McPherson James M., Cooper William James"‘Blueprint for Victory’" Writing the Civil War: The Quest to Understand 1998 Charlottesville University of South Carolina Press
23. Genovese Eugene The Political Economy of Slavery: Studies in the Economy and Society of the Slave South 1967 First Edition New York Vintage Books
24. Green James R. Death in the Haymarket: A Story of Chicago, the First Labor Movement, and the Bombing that Divided America 2006 New York Pantheon Books
25. Hahn Steven A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South, from Slavery to the Great Migration 2003 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press
26. Hahn Steven The Political Worlds of Slavery and Freedom 2009 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press
27. Holzer Harold The Lincoln Douglas Debates 1993 New York Harper-Collins
28. Jack Bryan M. The St. Louis African American Community and the Exodusters 2007 Columbia University of Missouri Press
29. Johnson Carol"‘The Problem of Reformism and Marx’s Theory of Fetishism’" New Left Review 1980Vol I 119 70 96
30. LaFeber Walter The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion, 1860–1898 1963 Ithaca Cornell University Press
31. Levine Bruce The Spirit of 1848: German Immigrants, Labor Conflict, and the Coming of the Civil War 1992 Urbana University of Illinois Press
32. McPherson James M. This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War 2007 Oxford Oxford University Press
33. McPherson James M. Foner"‘A. Lincoln, Commander in Chief’" 2008 2008
34. Marx Karl Marx, Engels"‘The North American Civil War’" 1961 [1861] 1961
35. Marx Karl Marx, Engels"‘Marx to Engels’" 1985 [1861] 1985
36. Marx Karl, Engels Friedrich The Civil War in the United States 1961 Third Edition New York International Publishers
37. Marx Karl, Engels Friedrich Collected Works 1984Vol Volume 19 Moscow Progress Publishers
38. Marx Karl, Engels Friedrich Collected Works 1985Vol Volume 41 London Lawrence and Wishart
39. Menand Louis The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America 2001 New York Farrar, Straus and Giroux
40. Messer-Kruse Timothy The Yankee International: Marxism and the American Reform Tradition, 1848–76 1998 Chapel Hill University of North Carolina Press
41. Montgomery David Beyond Equality: Labor and the Radical Republicans, 1862–1872 1967 New York Alfred A. Knopf
42. Moore Barrington Jr. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Transitions to Democracy 1966 New York Columbia University Press
43. Oakes James The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery 2007 New York W.W. Norton and Company
44. Oakes James Foner"‘Natural Rights, Citizenship Rights, States’ Rights, and Black Rights: Another Look at Lincoln and Race’" 2008 2008
45. Potter David M. Fehrenbacher Don E. The Impending Conflict, 1848–1861 1976 New York Harper and Row
46. Richards Leonard L. Gentlemen of Property and Standing: Anti-Abolition Mobs in Jacksonian America 1978 [1970] Oxford Oxford University Press
47. Ross Dorothy"‘Lincoln and the Ethics of Emancipation: Universalism, Nationalism, Exceptionalism’" The Journal of American History 2009Vol 96 2 379 399
48. Sinha Manisha Foner"‘Allies for Emancipation: Lincoln and Black Abolitionists’" 2008 2008
49. Stampp Kenneth M. And the War Came: The North and the Secession Crisis, 1860–1861 1970 Baton Rouge Louisiana State University Press
50. Vincent Charles Black Legislators in Louisiana During Reconstruction 1976 Baton Rouge Louisiana State University Press
51. Wilentz Sean The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln 2005 New York W.W. Norton and Company
52. FN0* This article is based on a lecture marking the bicentenary of Lincoln’s birth given as part of a series organised by the History Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in October 2009. I would like to thank David Levine and his colleagues for the invitation and for many helpful comments (while naturally absolving them from responsibility for particular judgements or mistakes).
53. FN11. Marx 1961.
54. FN22. Marx 1985, p. 114.
55. FN33. Marx 1961, pp. 57–70.
56. FN44. Marx 1961, p. 68. Here I only briefly explain and evaluate Marx’s analysis of the origins of the Civil War, though the texts I have cited clearly enough reject economic reductionism. Marx’s stress on the centrality of political issues can be compared with that found in Moore 1966. For a recent account using many of Marx’s concepts, see Ashworth 2007.
57. FN55. Marx 1961, p. 68.
58. FN66. Marx 1961, p. 71.
59. FN77. Marx and Engels 1984, p. 50.
60. FN88. Foner 2010.
61. FN99. Marx and Engels 1961, p. 72.
62. FN1010. Engels 1961, p. 326.
63. FN1111. Anderson 1996.
64. FN1212. Potter 1976; Genovese 1967; Foner 1970; Ashworth 1995; Ashworth 2007.
65. FN1313. Crofts 2005, p. 197.
66. FN1414. Abraham Lincoln, speech in Peoria (Illinois) on 16 October 1854, responding to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The quote from the Declaration of Independence strikes a patriotic note, though some might conclude that the speech also invalidated the break of 1776, given the prominence of slavery in several North-American slave-colonies. No doubt Lincoln would have insisted that the objection was not available to George III and his governments, since they were massively implicated in slavery, and that at least the Founding Fathers were uneasy about the institution.
67. FN1515. The phrase ‘And the war came’, taken from Lincoln’s Second Inaugural, has been adopted for many valuable accounts, but its implicit denial of Northern agency fails to acknowledge the emergence of a new nationalism or to pinpoint the Union’s legitimacy-deficit in 1861–2 and hence a vital factor impelling the President to remedy it. See, for example, Stampp 1970; Crofts 2005; McPherson 2007, p. 17.
68. FN1616. Wilentz 2005, p. 783. Wilentz proceeds from these remarks to the conclusion: ‘the only just and legitimate way to settle the matter [i.e. the difference over slavery-extension], Lincoln insisted . . . was through a deliberate democratic decision made by the citizenry.’ (Wilentz 2005, p. 763.) A riposte to this is suggested by Louis Menand’s observation: ‘the Civil War was a vindication, as Lincoln had hoped it would be, of the American experiment. Except for one thing, which is that people who live in democratic societies are not supposed to settle their disagreements by killing one another.’ (Menand 2001, p. x.)
69. FN1717. Quoted in Bensel 1990, p. 18. For an account of Seward’s expansionist plans and their frustration by the larger processes set in motion by the Civil War, see LaFeber 1963, pp. 24–32.
70. FN1818. Levine 1992.
71. FN1919. The over-representation of British immigrants in the ranks of antislavery activists in the 1830s is brought out in Richards 1978.
72. FN2020. Levine 1992, p. 125. In later decades some German-Americans did indeed soft-pedal women’s rights when seeking to recruit Irish-American trade-unionists, but, while this should be duly noted, it is far from characterising all German-Americans, whether followers of Marx or not. For an interesting study, which sometimes veers towards caricature, see Messer-Kruse 1998. This author has a justifiable pride in the native American radical tradition and some valid criticisms of some of the positions adopted by German-American ‘Marxists’ but is so obsessed with pitting the two ethnic political cultures against one another that he fails to notice how effectively they often combined, especially in the years 1850–70. See Buhle 1991 for a more balanced assessment.
73. FN2121. Barkin 2008, p. 71.
74. FN2222. Gallagher 1998.
75. FN2323. Marx and Engels 1984, pp. 233–4.
76. FN2424. Marx and Engels 1961, pp. 202–6.
77. FN2525. Marx and Engels 1961, p. 258.
78. FN2626. Slave-resistance and black abolitionism played vital rôles in radicalising many Republicans and Union soldiers, a development that Marx and Engels anticipated but did not thereafter write much about. The thousands of fugitives of 1861 grew to as many as 400,000 by the end of the War, or a little over a tenth of the slave-population, with the remainder working to meet their own needs rather than for their owner. See Hahn 2009. The Emancipation Proclamation did not attempt the impossible task of discriminating between loyal and rebel owners inside the Confederacy, and, in practice, Union offices were often to accept refugees if they needed recruits or labourers, even if these refugees might have originated from the border-states.
79. FN2727. McPherson 2008, p. 33.
80. FN2828. For an account which seriously addresses the issue of Unionist nationalism, see Bensel 1990, pp. 18–47.
81. FN2929. Ross 2009, p. 346.
82. FN3030. Menand 2001, p. 45.
83. FN3131. Menand 2001, pp. 52–3.
84. FN3232. Lincoln’s long attachment to the colonisation-idea is documented in Foner 2008.
85. FN3333. Holzer (ed.) 1993, p. 189. This was not an off-hand remark, but forms part of a careful introduction to his speech.
86. FN3434. Marx and Engels 1961, p. 273.
87. FN3535. Marx and Engels 1961, pp. 260–1.
88. FN3636. Marx and Engels 1961, p. 281. The meanings of the address are rarely considered, which makes it the more regrettable when it is interpreted in a tendentious way, as is the case with Messer-Kruse 1998, pp. 54–6, in which he has Marx complaining at the ‘bother’ of having to write something of such little importance as the address and that he only consented to do so because: ‘In Marx’s view, slavery had to be destroyed in order to allow for the historical development of the white working class.’ (Messer-Kruse 1998, p. 54.)
89. FN3737. Marx and Engels 1961, pp. 262–3.
90. FN3838. Vincent 1976, p. 22.
91. FN3939. Oakes 2007.
92. FN4040. For Lincoln’s long attachment to colonisation, see Foner 2008. Sinha 2008 documents the African-American contribution to changing Lincoln’s mind on the question. Oakes 2008 argues that the ‘unrequited labour’ strand in Lincoln’s rejection of slavery became more marked in the late 1850s and the War years.
93. FN4141. Quoted in Fredrickson 2008, p. 126.
94. FN4242. In this text Marx, who again wrote it, heaps praise on Lincoln as ‘a man neither to be browbeaten by adversity, nor intoxicated by success, inflexibly pressing on to his great goal, never compromising it by blind haste, slowly maturing his steps, never retracing them, carried away by no surge of popular favour, disheartened by no slackening of the popular pulse; tempering stern acts by the gleam of a kind heart, illuminating scenes dark with passion by the smile of humour, doing his titanic work as humbly and homely as heaven-born rulers do little things with the grandiloquence of pomp and state. Such, indeed, was the modesty of this great and good man that the world only discovered him a hero after he had fallen a martyr.’ (Marx and Engels 1961, p. 358.)
95. FN4343. Marx and Engels 1961, pp. 276–7.
96. FN4444. Marx and Engels 1961, p. 277.
97. FN4545. The classic study of the free-labour doctrine is Foner 1970.
98. FN4646. Montgomery 1967.
99. FN4747. Fernbach 1974, p. 14.
100. FN4848. As Carol Johnson points out, this leaves little room for long-term reformism. See Johnson 1980.
101. FN4949. Draper 1986, p. 273.
102. FN5050. Dunayevskaya 1971, pp. 81–91.
103. FN5151. See Blackburn 2010, pp. 153–76.
104. FN5252. Quoted in Messer-Kruse 1998, p. 191.
105. FN5353. Draper 1986, p. 15.
106. FN5454. See Foner 1988 and Hahn 2003, pp. 103–5.
107. FN5555. See Blackburn 2010 and also Burbank 1978. For the rôle of African-Americans in the strike and later, see Jack 2007, especially pp. 142–50. See also Bruce 1959; Foner 1977; Green 2006.

Article metrics loading...


Affiliations: 1: University of


Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Historical Materialism — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation